-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
Open
Labels
Team:IngestIssues owned by the Ingest Docs TeamIssues owned by the Ingest Docs TeamTeam:ObsIssues owned by the Observability Docs TeamIssues owned by the Observability Docs Teamsource:webIssues originating from the elastic.co docsIssues originating from the elastic.co docs
Description
Type of issue
None
What documentation page is affected
https://www.elastic.co/docs/reference/opentelemetry/motlp
What happened?
Some items which should be reviewed with SMEs:
- Is there a minimum version of semconv we should respect to use Managed OTLP Input?
- We should state if we have guarnateed delivery (at least once? something else?)
- Highlight the reason/advantage of using Managed OTLP Input, in particular the fact it can act as an EDOT Gateway (except if the use case requires features which are not available such as TBS or specific processing via OTTL processors)
- We should have a section which tells where the data will end up depending on the signal, similar to what we have for APM Server/Integration https://www.elastic.co/docs/solutions/observability/apm/data-streams#apm-data-streams-list
- List what are the products we test against Managed OTel Input (e.g. EDOT Collector, EDOT SDKs, EDOT Cloud Forwarder, etc...)
- How a user can change the data retention period
- Is the service rate limited or throttled? Are there limits on the throughput?
- How can the user add fields or tweak the number of shards/replicas/policy per namespace?
- Is this service billed?
Additional info
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Team:IngestIssues owned by the Ingest Docs TeamIssues owned by the Ingest Docs TeamTeam:ObsIssues owned by the Observability Docs TeamIssues owned by the Observability Docs Teamsource:webIssues originating from the elastic.co docsIssues originating from the elastic.co docs