Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve UI #18

Open
jsalzbergedu opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Improve UI #18

jsalzbergedu opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@jsalzbergedu
Copy link

So I saw an earlier issue about compilation mode and coloring..

Would it be alright if I worked on improving the UI aesthetics a bit when running tests, possibly by switching from compilation mode to some custom mode? I think this would especially be good if, in some day in the future, you wanted to find the source of failing tests or some such.

Thanks :)

@yyoncho
Copy link
Member

yyoncho commented Nov 16, 2018

Sure, any improvements are welcomed. Few comments from my TODO list:

  1. It would be good if dap-mode allows navigation to classes(e. g. you could jump to stacktrace class/logger class)
  2. We could do integration with https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode-java-test/blob/master/extension/README.md which will allow displaying reports inside Emacs.
  3. We could also implement a report view using the JUnil console launcher which displays tests tree.

I have implemented the bare minimum needed for running the tests.

@jsalzbergedu
Copy link
Author

Just so you know I'm (still) working on a nice test report displayer :)

@yyoncho
Copy link
Member

yyoncho commented Jan 8, 2019

Sure, take your time, it is coding for fun after all :)

@credmp
Copy link

credmp commented Jan 9, 2020

@jsalzbergedu if you have something that can use some testing I am more then happy to help out. I would love to have some UI love in the testing area.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants