Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TwoWay coupling issue #1323

Closed
danielabdi-noaa opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

TwoWay coupling issue #1323

danielabdi-noaa opened this issue Nov 28, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@danielabdi-noaa
Copy link

It seems that the two-way coupling option has issues. Results from a rising thermal buble problem (modified density current), I get correct results with one way coupling
srtb-amrex-0029

Two-way coupling, on the other hand, seems to think that the level 1 grid has physical boundaries on the sides.
srtb-amrex-twoway-0060

Unrelated to this issue: Is it possible to write "point data" to paraview file for better visualization?

@asalmgren
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielabdi-noaa -- I'm going to close this issue -- hopefully the problem is fixed but let me know!

@danielabdi-noaa
Copy link
Author

@asalmgren Unfortunately I was not able to run correctly either the denisity current or the RTB problem posted here with "TwoWay" coupling option. Solution diverges quickly now, as opposed to the behaviour I described in this issue where the coupling boundary acts like a physical boundary. Let me know when you fix the density current test case I sent you. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants