You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that the two-way coupling option has issues. Results from a rising thermal buble problem (modified density current), I get correct results with one way coupling
Two-way coupling, on the other hand, seems to think that the level 1 grid has physical boundaries on the sides.
Unrelated to this issue: Is it possible to write "point data" to paraview file for better visualization?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@asalmgren Unfortunately I was not able to run correctly either the denisity current or the RTB problem posted here with "TwoWay" coupling option. Solution diverges quickly now, as opposed to the behaviour I described in this issue where the coupling boundary acts like a physical boundary. Let me know when you fix the density current test case I sent you. Thanks!
It seems that the two-way coupling option has issues. Results from a rising thermal buble problem (modified density current), I get correct results with one way coupling

Two-way coupling, on the other hand, seems to think that the level 1 grid has physical boundaries on the sides.

Unrelated to this issue: Is it possible to write "point data" to paraview file for better visualization?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: