Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistency between geostrophic forcing and coriolis terms #191

Closed
ewquon opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconsistency between geostrophic forcing and coriolis terms #191

ewquon opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ewquon
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ewquon
Copy link
Contributor

ewquon commented Nov 9, 2021

In steady state for abl_driver_type == "GeostrophicWind", the added forcing term should balance out the Coriolis terms. There appears to be missing sine/cosine terms as well as a vertical forcing component based on U_g.
@ewquon ewquon added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 9, 2021
@ewquon ewquon self-assigned this Nov 9, 2021
@ewquon ewquon mentioned this issue Nov 11, 2021
Merged
@ewquon
Copy link
Contributor Author

ewquon commented Nov 18, 2021

Addressed by ea6d8ca, included in #196

@ewquon ewquon closed this as completed Nov 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ewquon ewquon

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ewquon