chore(tests|forks): add max blobs per tx limit

[spencer-tb]

🗒️ Description

Following the changes to EIP-7594: ethereum/EIPs#9981

Adds some more execute_blobs tests for PeerDAS, including tests for the new max blobs per tx limit.

Updates fork logic and EIP-4844 tests to use a new max_blobs_per_tx function.

Adds specific tests for the new change (including transition tests) within the PeerDAS EIP testing folder.

Currently filling with this eels_resolution.json:

    "Osaka": {
        "git_url": "https://github.com/spencer-tb/execution-specs.git",
        "branch": "forks/osaka",
        "commit": "07699170182691533023fa5d83086258c3edcfd3"
    }

The magic EELS commit is: ethereum/execution-specs@0769917

Requires

• chore(forks|tests): fork agnostic blob tx wrapper version #1892 to fix these tests: test_blob_txs_full.py::test_reject_valid_full_blob_in_block_rlp
• chore(ci): bump prague to stable and osaka to develop #1573 to fix: test_excess_blob_gas_fork_transition.py::test_fork_transition_excess_blob_gas_post_blob_genesis

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

#1798

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx --with=tox-uv tox -e lint,typecheck,spellcheck,markdownlint

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

[spencer-tb]

I tried to fix the coverage for this line below, in the following commit:

// Ensure the total blob gas spent is at most equal to the limit
if (*test_block.block_info.blob_gas_used > state::max_blob_gas_per_block(rev))
    return false;

[kclowes]

Nothing obvious stands out to me here! 🚀

[marioevz]

Looks great! Just a couple of comments, thanks!

[marioevz]

We could check whether max per block != max per tx instead of checking explicitly for Osaka.

[spencer-tb]

Yeah I think I had this initially but changed it to this to see if it would fix the coverage! I will revert back.

[marioevz]

Nice.