Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unclear highlight intention of bidirectional edges #6

Open
frederickpek opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Unclear highlight intention of bidirectional edges #6

frederickpek opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
severity.Low type.Task Something that needs to be done, but not a story, bug or epic wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@frederickpek
Copy link
Owner

frederickpek commented Jan 7, 2022

image

Most of the algorithms highlight edges, uv, to indicate that it was "used", "relaxed" in that direction.
When uv is a bidirectional edge, it could seem as if edge vu is being highlighted - the intention may be unclear.

In the algorithms implemented, edges will be faded if they are not to be included. This process is ignored when visiting an edge vu when uv has already been highlighted (to retain the highlighted status of uv).

A possible solution could be to fade the arrow head of edge vu. This change is not exactly friendly to work with considering the project deadlines, and thus, this issue will probably not be fixed,

@frederickpek frederickpek added type.Task Something that needs to be done, but not a story, bug or epic severity.Low priority.Low labels Jan 7, 2022
@frederickpek frederickpek changed the title Unclear Highlight of Bidirectional Edges Unclear highlight intention of bidirectional edges Jan 7, 2022
@frederickpek frederickpek added wontfix This will not be worked on and removed priority.Low labels Jan 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
severity.Low type.Task Something that needs to be done, but not a story, bug or epic wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant