You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+2-9
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -232,20 +232,13 @@ The comparison is difficult because the roadmap and trade-offs of each framework
232
232
233
233
React is the source of inspiration for fre. Their implementation and asynchronous rendering are similar. The most amazing thing is **concurrent mode**, which means that react and fre have the same roadmap -- **Exploring concurrent use cases**.
234
234
235
-
But at the same time, fre has obvious advantages in reconciliation algorithm and bundle size.
235
+
But at the same time, fre has obvious advantages in concurrent mode and bundle size.
236
236
237
237
- vue / preact
238
238
239
239
To some extent, vue and preact are similar. They have similar synchronous rendering, only the API is different.
240
240
241
-
The reconciliation algorithm of fre is similar to vue3, but the biggest difference is that vue/preact do not support concurrent mode, this means that the roadmap is totally different.
The reconciliation algorithm of fre is similar to vue2, but the biggest difference is that vue/preact do not support concurrent mode, this means that the roadmap is totally different.
0 commit comments