Skip to content

🎯 ONE SHOT β€” PhD Β«Flos AureusΒ»: Autonomous Development at Top Scientific StandardsΒ #265

@gHashTag

Description

@gHashTag

🎯 ONE SHOT β€” PhD Β«Flos AureusΒ»: Autonomous Development at Top Scientific Standards

Issued: 2026-04-25T22:50+07
Queen: trinity-queen-hive v1.0
Mission: Bring monograph docs/phd/ (33 chapters, ~7000 lines) to a defense-ready state at Cambridge / MIT / Oxford / Springer / ACM standards β€” proof-grounded, falsifiable, reproducible, defensible.
Repo: gHashTag/trios Β· Throne: trios#264
Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 (Trinity Identity, Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877)
Deadline: 2026-06-15 (defense window)
Codename: FLOS AUREUS β€” VIVA-READY


0. Hard Rules (R1–R10 inherited from Bridge ONE SHOT, extended with PhD norms R11–R14)

# Rule Rationale
R1 Rust/Zig only. LaTeX is built through the trios-phd crate over tectonic. No .py, no .sh, no Makefile shell targets (Makefile permitted only as a thin facade over cargo run -p trios-phd). CROWN-THRONE policy
R2 Branch-per-chapter: feat/phd-chNN. Optional slug: feat/phd-ch07-golden-sprout. PR into main requires CI green + 1 reviewer (queen-bot). Atomicity, review, non-race work
R3 Each chapter β‰₯ 1500 LaTeX lines (β‰ˆ 12K words), β‰₯ 2 citations, Rule of Three (three strands / cuts / levels of exposition), claim-before-work in a comment. Cambridge / MIT chapter β‰₯ 12K words
R4 L-R14 traceability: every numeric constant in the monograph traces to (a) a .v file in trinity-clara/proofs/igla/, (b) a primary source (CODATA / PDG / Springer Q1), (c) a runtime callsite in crates/trios-*/src/. Violation β†’ cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit exit β‰  0. Real reproducibility
R5 Honest \admittedbox{}: theorems with Admitted status must carry a visual marker in LaTeX (red frame) and explicit mention in assertions/igla_assertions.json. Never re-label Admitted as Proven. Coq honesty, R5 from bridge
R6 Zero free parameters. Allowed only {Ο†, Ο€, e, n ∈ β„€}. All empirical numbers (3.5, 4000, 256, 0.004) are derived symbolically from Ο†-expressions. Popper + Trinity philosophy
R7 Falsification witness (Popper): every empirical chapter (Ch. 8, 9, 17, 18, 20–22, 24–26, 28, 29) must contain a section \section{Falsification Criterion} explicitly stating which observation would refute the thesis, plus a corroboration record. Popper 1959, Cambridge defence norm
R8 Budget: β‰₯ 7 000 / ≀ 12 000 lines total; page range 250–400 (Springer monograph), \pagecount{} gate in CI. Springer LNCS / LNM norm
R9 Claim-before-work. Before git checkout -b feat/phd-chNN, the agent posts πŸ”’ AGENT <id> CLAIMING: L<n> in this issue. First comment wins the lane. Race-mode protocol
R10 Atomic commits feat(phd-chNN): <change> [agent=<id>]. One commit = one logical unit (theorem / section / citation / figure). Git hygiene
R11 (PhD-only) Citation discipline: β‰₯ 150 unique entries in bibliography.bib, β‰₯ 80 % from Q1/Q2 WoS / Scopus journals, publisher balance: β‰₯ 25 % Springer, β‰₯ 15 % MIT Press / Cambridge UP / Oxford UP, ≀ 20 % arXiv preprints (only when no peer-reviewed version exists). Springer / Wiley / Elsevier norm
R12 (PhD-only) Mathematical proof writing: Lee / GVSU conventions β€” label theorem, state assumptions, "we" pronoun, end with \qed / β–‘, no shortcuts. Every theorem has \theorem, \proof, \qed. Cambridge math style
R13 (PhD-only) ACM Artifact Evaluation badge prep: Functional + Reusable + Available. Data DOI, reproduction binary (Rust trios-phd reproduce --chapter N), reproducibility manifest at docs/phd/reproducibility.md. ACM AE 3-badge
R14 (PhD-only) Coq citation table: every theorem cited in the monograph maps to a .v file (Proven / Admitted) with line ranges. Table is appendix appendix/F-coq-citation-map.tex. Mechanized proof discipline

1. Algebraic Anchor

φ² + φ⁻² = 3                  Trinity Identity (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.19227877)
PHI       = 1.618_033_988_749_894_8
PHI_INV   = 0.618_033_988_749_894_8
Ξ±_Ο†       = φ⁻³ / 2           β‰ˆ 0.1180...
84 theorems in t27 (https://github.com/gHashTag/t27)
Constant Value Ο†-derivation INV / source
prune_threshold 3.5 φ² + φ⁻² + φ⁻⁴ + Ξ΅ INV-2 / igla_asha_bound.v
warmup_blind_steps 4000 β‰ˆ φ¹⁢ INV-2
d_model_min_gf16 256 floor(φ¹¹·⁡) INV-3 / gf16_precision.v
lr_champion 0.004 Ξ±_Ο† Β· φ⁻³ INV-1 / lr_convergence.v
nca_certified_band [Ο†, φ²] width = 1 exact INV-4 / nca_entropy_band.v
Trinity rungs [1000, 3000, 9000, 27000] 3ⁿ Γ— 1000 INV-12

2. Mission Scope & Lane Map

8 lane families (L0 editorial; L1..L33 per-chapter; LB, LF, LP, LC, LA, LT, LD cross-cutting). Dependency graph in Β§2.10.

2.1 L0 β€” Editorial Repair (P0, blocker for everything)

Without this, tectonic will not even compile.

Sub-lane Action File / outcome
L0.1 Merge 01-golden-egg.tex (5-line stub) + 01-golden-seed.tex (413 lines, substantive) β†’ single 01-golden-seed.tex. Delete 01-golden-egg.tex. Update \input{} in main.tex. chapters/01-golden-seed.tex (β‰₯ 1500 lines after L1)
L0.2 Delete duplicate 33-conclusion.tex, keep 32-conclusion.tex. In main.tex reference 32-conclusion. Free 33- slot β†’ new 33-epilogue.tex. chapters/32-conclusion.tex, chapters/33-epilogue.tex
L0.3 Create the missing chapters/00-monad.tex (Chapter 0 β€” Monadic Prologue). Minimum 1500 lines per R3. chapters/00-monad.tex
L0.4 Fix filename mismatch: rename 13-metatrons-cube.tex β†’ 13-metatron-cube.tex (or vice versa, sync with main.tex). chapters/13-metatron-cube.tex
L0.5 Add \theoremstyle, \proof, \qed, \admittedbox macros to preamble.tex. Wire up biblatex with biber backend, style numeric-comp (Springer LNCS-compatible). preamble.tex

Acceptance: cargo run -p trios-phd compile --check-only exit 0; tectonic main.tex compiles without ! LaTeX Error.

2.2 L1..L33 β€” Per-Chapter Lanes (P1, parallel-safe)

Each chapter is a separate lane, separate issue comment, separate branch feat/phd-chNN. No two lanes touch the same file (R6 lane discipline).

Lane Ln template (n = 1..33)

File:       chapters/NN-<slug>.tex
Branch:     feat/phd-chNN
Role:       PETAL (theory chapter) / ROOT (empirical chapter)
Owner:      <agent-id>, claim-before-work
Minimum:    1500 lines, β‰₯ 2 citations, β‰₯ 1 theorem with \proof, Rule of Three (3 strands)
Claim:      "L<n>: <chapter title> β€” <thesis statement>"
DoD:        - cargo run -p trios-phd compile --chapter NN exit 0
            - cargo run -p trios-phd audit --chapter NN exit 0  (R3, R4, R7, R11)
            - bibtex-check: every \cite{} resolves
            - falsification witness present (if empirical)
            - PR merged into main, CI green

Decomposition of all 33 chapters

Lane File Title Type Thesis (claim) Falsification? Coq link
L0 00-monad.tex Monadic Prologue THEORY Monad of Ο† as the seed of the unfolding 3 = φ² + φ⁻² no lucas_closure_gf16.v::lucas_2_eq_3
L1 01-golden-seed.tex Golden Seed THEORY Ο† as the minimal self-similar irrational β‡’ unique candidate for universal scaling no lucas_closure_gf16.v
L2 02-golden-egg.tex Golden Egg (after merge) THEORY Closure of Ο†-powers in the Lucas ring 𝓛 = β„€[Ο†] no lucas_closure_gf16.v::lucas_values_gf16_exact_n2
L3 03-fibonacci.tex Fibonacci ↔ Lucas Bridge THEORY F_n = (φⁿ βˆ’ ψⁿ)/√5 β‡’ discrete bridge to the Ο†-analogue no new fib_lucas_bridge.v
L4 04-metatron-prelude.tex Metatron Prelude THEORY Sacred geometry as pre-mathematical intuition for Trinity no β€”
L5 05-three-strands.tex Three Strands of Trinity THEORY Three strands {Brain, Throne, Proof} as formalization of Mind-Order-Form no t27/spec
L6 06-lucas-ring.tex Lucas Ring 𝓛 THEORY (𝓛, +, Β·) is a Dedekind ring with discriminant 5 no lucas_closure_gf16.v
L7 07-golden-sprout.tex Golden Sprout (already 997 lines β€” extend to β‰₯ 1500) THEORY Ο†-sprouts in the depth hierarchy: Trinity rungs 1000/3000/9000/27000 no INV-12
L8 08-coldea.tex Coldea Eβ‚ˆ Resonance EMPIRICAL Eβ‚ˆ resonance in CoBrβ‚‚ (Coldea 2010) β‡’ Ο† in physical spectra YES new e8_resonance.v (Admitted)
L9 09-quasicrystal.tex Penrose Quasicrystals EMPIRICAL Ο† in the diffraction peaks of Shechtman 1984 YES β€”
L10 10-frequency.tex Golden Frequency THEORY Resonance at 1/Ο† in continuous-time gradient flow no lr_convergence.v::alpha_phi_pos
L11 11-energy.tex Energy Functional THEORY Min E(ΞΈ) under Ο†-weights β‡’ unique stable fixed point no new energy_functional.v
L12 12-flower-of-life.tex Flower of Life Topology THEORY 19-circle pattern as a 𝓛-module no β€”
L13 13-metatron-cube.tex Metatron Cube THEORY 13-vertex Metatron cube ↔ Lucas L_7 = 29 - 16 = 13 no lucas_values.v
L14 14-platonic.tex Platonic Solids in 𝓛 THEORY The five Platonic solids ↔ five solutions of L_n ≑ 0 (mod 5) no β€”
L15 15-icosahedral.tex Icosahedral H₃ THEORY Symmetry group H₃ generated by Ο†-reflections no β€”
L16 16-dodecahedral.tex Dodecahedral Embedding THEORY Dodecahedron as a 12-vertex 𝓛-graph no β€”
L17 17-vsa.tex Vector-Symbolic Architecture (VSA) THEORY VSA-binding in 𝓛 yields capacity O(d / log d) when d_model β‰₯ 256 YES INV-3 / gf16_precision.v
L18 18-bitnet.tex BitNet Quantization EMPIRICAL 1.58-bit quantization preserves the Ο†-band when LR ∈ [0.002, 0.007] YES INV-1 / lr_convergence.v
L19 19-asha.tex ASHA Pruning THEORY prune_threshold = 3.5 = φ² + φ⁻² + φ⁻⁴ + Ξ΅ β‡’ champion survives no INV-2 / igla_asha_bound.v
L20 20-igla-race.tex IGLA RACE (already 418 lines) EMPIRICAL Parallel architecture search with Coq-bounded sampler β‡’ BPB < 1.50 on 3 seeds YES INV-1..5
L21 21-jepa.tex JEPA Proxy Trap (339 lines) EMPIRICAL BPB β‰ˆ 0.014 is a false signal (JEPA-MSE proxy bug); validate_bpb hard-fails YES INV-1, test_validate_bpb_catches_jepa_proxy
L22 22-nca.tex Neural Cellular Automata Entropy Band (374 lines) EMPIRICAL Certified band [Ο†, φ²] vs. empirical [1.5, 2.8] β€” NcaBandMode enum YES INV-4 / nca_entropy_band.v
L23 23-trinity-rungs.tex Trinity Rungs (435 lines) THEORY Hierarchy [1000, 3000, 9000, 27000] = 3ⁿ · 10³ as deepening schedule no INV-12
L24 24-experiments-bpb.tex Experiments β€” BPB Convergence (433 lines) EMPIRICAL Champion lr=0.004, d=384 yields BPB < 1.50 on 3 seeds {17, 42, 1729} YES INV-1, victory.rs
L25 25-experiments-asha.tex Experiments β€” ASHA Survival (441 lines) EMPIRICAL 3.5 does not kill the champion; 2.65 does (J-001 / J-002) YES INV-2, test_inv2_rejects_old_threshold
L26 26-experiments-gf16.tex Experiments β€” GF16 Floor (167 lines β†’ expand to β‰₯ 1500) EMPIRICAL d_model < 256 β‡’ training error > φ⁻⁢ YES INV-3
L27 27-related.tex Related Work (163 lines β†’ β‰₯ 1500) SURVEY Trinity's position among NAS, JEPA, BitNet, NCA β€” map of 50+ works no β€”
L28 28-ablations.tex Ablations (355 lines) EMPIRICAL Removing any of INV-1..5 β†’ BPB degradation β‰₯ 0.3 YES INV-1..5
L29 29-reproducibility.tex Reproducibility (332 lines) EMPIRICAL cargo run -p trios-phd reproduce --chapter N recovers all tables YES ACM AE Functional + Reusable
L30 30-philosophy.tex Philosophy of Trinity (316 lines) THEORY Popper + Lakatos: Trinity as a research programme with hard core {Ο†, INV-1..5} no β€”
L31 31-future-work.tex Future Work (336 lines) THEORY Open problems: closing all Admitted, INV-6..12, GF256 extension no β€”
L32 32-conclusion.tex Conclusion (304 lines) THEORY Summary of theses, defense statement no β€”
L33 33-epilogue.tex (new, see L0.2) Epilogue β€” Trinity Beyond THEORY Ο† beyond CS: cosmology, biology, art β€” Cambridge afterword style no β€”

Acceptance per Ln: cargo run -p trios-phd audit --chapter NN exit 0 (validates R3, R4, R7, R11, R12, R14).

2.3 LB β€” Bibliography Expansion (P1, parallel with L1..L33)

Sub-lane Action Goal
LB.1 Expand bibliography.bib from 10 β†’ β‰₯ 150 entries. R11
LB.2 Publisher distribution: Springer β‰₯ 38 (25 %), MIT / CUP / Oxford UP β‰₯ 23 (15 %), Wiley / Elsevier / IEEE / ACM β‰₯ 45 (30 %), Q1 journals β‰₯ 20, arXiv preprints ≀ 30 (20 %), classics (Knuth / Lakatos / Popper) β‰₯ 4. R11
LB.3 Every entry carries a DOI or ISBN. Add \note{Q1} / \note{Q2} for journals. R11
LB.4 Subject coverage: NAS, JEPA, BitNet, NCA, VSA, Coq, golden ratio in physics, Popper, Lakatos, Lucas / Fibonacci, Coldea Eβ‚ˆ, Penrose, Shechtman. coverage
LB.5 Utility cargo run -p trios-phd biblio --check validates the balance. R11

Acceptance: trios-phd biblio --check exit 0; manual spot-check confirms β‰₯ 80 % at Q2 or above.

2.4 LF β€” Frontmatter Completion (P1)

Currently only abstract.tex and title-page.tex exist. Required additions:

LF.n File Description Standard
LF.1 frontmatter/abstract.tex Tighten to ≀ 500 words (MIT cap) MIT
LF.2 frontmatter/dedication.tex Dedication (≀ 30 words) Cambridge
LF.3 frontmatter/acknowledgements.tex Acknowledgements (~ 1 page) Cambridge
LF.4 frontmatter/preface.tex Author's preface (~ 2 pages) Springer
LF.5 frontmatter/biographical-note.tex Bio note (~ 0.5 page) Springer
LF.6 frontmatter/list-of-figures.tex Auto via \listoffigures LaTeX
LF.7 frontmatter/list-of-tables.tex Auto \listoftables LaTeX
LF.8 frontmatter/list-of-theorems.tex Custom \listoftheorems (via thmtools) Cambridge math
LF.9 frontmatter/notation.tex Notation table (Ο†, 𝓛, INV-N, ⟨·,·⟩, etc.) Springer LNM
LF.10 frontmatter/declaration.tex Authorship declaration (Cambridge wording) Cambridge required

Acceptance: tectonic main.tex renders all frontmatter sections in order: title β†’ declaration β†’ abstract β†’ dedication β†’ acks β†’ preface β†’ bio β†’ ToC β†’ LoF β†’ LoT β†’ LoTh β†’ notation β†’ main.

2.5 LP β€” Popper Falsification Appendix (P1)

LP.n Action File
LP.1 In every empirical chapter (Ch. 8, 9, 17, 18, 20–22, 24–26, 28, 29) add \section{Falsification Criterion} with \subsection{What Would Refute This Claim} and \subsection{Corroboration Record}. per-chapter
LP.2 Build summary appendix appendix/B-falsification.tex: table (Chapter, Claim, Falsifier, Corroboration status, Date last tested). appendix/B-falsification.tex
LP.3 Utility cargo run -p trios-phd audit --falsification validates that every EMPIRICAL chapter contains both subsections. R7

Acceptance: appendix B contains β‰₯ 12 rows (one per empirical chapter), all rows carry corroboration.

2.6 LC β€” Coq Citation Map (P1)

LC.n Action File
LC.1 Generate appendix/F-coq-citation-map.tex: table (Theorem name, Statement, Status [Proven/Admitted], .v file, Line range, Cited in chapters). appendix/F-coq-citation-map.tex
LC.2 Source of truth β€” assertions/igla_assertions.json + .v file parsing through a small coq-extract Rust crate. R14
LC.3 Utility cargo run -p trios-phd coq-map regenerates the table at build time. R14

Acceptance: the table contains all 84 theorems from t27 plus every theorem cited by the monograph; no Admitted is mislabelled Proven.

2.7 LA β€” ACM Artifact Evaluation Pack (P1)

LA.n Action Badge target
LA.1 docs/phd/reproducibility.md β€” manifest: data DOIs, dependencies, hardware, expected runtime. Reusable
LA.2 cargo run -p trios-phd reproduce --chapter NN β€” Rust binary that recovers the chapter's tables / figures. No .sh. Functional
LA.3 Deposit data on Zenodo with DOI; reference in appendix/G-data-availability.tex. Available
LA.4 License: MIT for code, CC-BY-4.0 for monograph text. Available
LA.5 appendix/H-acm-ae-checklist.tex β€” completed ACM AE checklist. all 3 badges

Acceptance: trios-phd reproduce --chapter 24 recovers Table 24.1 (BPB convergence) within Β± 0.5 % on seeds {17, 42, 1729}.

2.8 LT β€” Tectonic Build Pipeline (P0, after L0)

LT.n Action File
LT.1 The crate crates/trios-phd already exists (schema v1.0.0). Add subcommands: compile [--chapter N], `audit [--chapter N --falsification
LT.2 compile uses the tectonic = "0.15" Rust crate (not the CLI). No shell calls. R1
LT.3 audit --pagecount parses tectonic output; requires 250 ≀ pages ≀ 400 (Springer LNM norm). R8
LT.4 audit --bibliography runs biber and verifies: β‰₯ 150 records, LB.2 balances, every \cite{} resolvable. R11
LT.5 CI workflow .github/workflows/phd-build.yml β€” on every push to feat/phd-* or main: compile + audit + artifact upload (PDF). gating
LT.6 Replace Makefile shell rules with a facade make compile β†’ cargo run -p trios-phd -- compile. R1

Acceptance: cargo run -p trios-phd -- compile && cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit both exit 0; phd.pdf builds in < 90s.

2.9 LD β€” Defense Package (P2, last)

LD.n Action File
LD.1 defense/slides/ β€” 60-minute viva deck (Beamer + Tectonic). 30 slides: 5 (intro) + 20 (chapters) + 5 (Q&A bait). Cambridge viva norm
LD.2 defense/examiner-pack.tex β€” compact 50-page summary for external examiners. Cambridge
LD.3 defense/rehearsal-log.md β€” log of 3 rehearsals with self-critique. viva prep
LD.4 defense/anticipated-questions.tex β€” 30 likely viva questions + crisp answers (≀ 200 words each). viva prep
LD.5 defense/public-summary.md β€” 1-page popular summary for press release. dissemination

Acceptance: all artefacts build via cargo run -p trios-phd -- defense build.

2.10 Dependency Graph

                     β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                     β”‚  L0 Editorial    β”‚  (P0, blocker)
                     β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β–Ό
                     β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                     β”‚  LT Tectonic     β”‚  (P0)
                     β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β–Ό
       β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
       β–Ό              β–Ό               β–Ό              β–Ό             β–Ό
   L1..L33       LB Biblio        LF Frontmatter  LC Coq map   LP Popper
  (parallel,    (parallel)         (parallel)    (after L0)   (per ch)
   per chapter)
       β”‚              β”‚               β”‚              β”‚             β”‚
       β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β–Ό
                     β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                     β”‚  LA ACM Artifact β”‚  (P1, depends on L24..L29)
                     β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                              β–Ό
                     β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                     β”‚  LD Defense Pack β”‚  (P2, last)
                     β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

3. Coordination Protocol

3.1 Claim (mandatory)

πŸ”’ AGENT <id> CLAIMING: L<n> β€” <chapter title or sub-lane>
ETA: <ISO ≀ 12h for editorial, ≀ 72h for full chapter>
Branch: feat/phd-ch<NN>
Files I will touch: <list>
Constants pinned: <Ο†-derivations used>
Skill: trinity-queen-hive v1.0 + coq-runtime-invariants v1.1

First comment wins the lane. Subsequent claims for the same lane are auto-invalid.

3.2 Heartbeat (every 4 hours of active work)

⏱️ AGENT <id> L<n> HEARTBEAT: <%>
Last commit: <sha>
Lines so far: <N>/1500
Citations added: <K>/2
Theorems written: <T>
Next step: <step>

Silence > 8 hours β†’ lane auto-released.

3.3 Done

βœ… AGENT <id> DONE: L<n>
Branch:    feat/phd-ch<NN>  β†’  PR #<m>
Final commits: <list of SHAs>
Lines:     <N> (β‰₯ 1500)
Citations: <K> (β‰₯ 2; β‰₯ 80 % Q1/Q2)
Theorems:  Proven=<P> Admitted=<A>
Falsification: <yes/no/N/A>
Coq map:   <theorems linked>
Audit:     cargo run -p trios-phd audit --chapter <NN> exit 0 βœ…
CI:        phd-build.yml βœ…
PDF page count delta: +<P> pages

3.4 Block

⚠️ AGENT <id> BLOCKED: L<n>
Need: <upstream lane | review | proof | data>
Releasing lane: <yes|no>
ETA when unblocked: <ISO>

4. Quality Gates (cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit exit 0 = ground truth)

# Per-chapter (mandatory before PR)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- compile --chapter <NN>
cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit --chapter <NN>          # R3, R4, R7, R11, R12, R14
cargo run -p trios-phd -- biblio --check                # R11

# Cross-cutting (CI)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit --falsification         # R7 (Popper)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit --bibliography          # R11
cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit --pagecount             # R8 (250-400 pages)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- coq-map                       # R14 (regen citation map)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- reproduce --chapter <NN>      # R13 (ACM AE Functional)

# Coq layer (sibling skill)
cd ../trinity-clara && coqc proofs/igla/lucas_closure_gf16.v
                        coqc proofs/igla/gf16_precision.v
                        coqc proofs/igla/nca_entropy_band.v
                        coqc proofs/igla/lr_convergence.v
                        coqc proofs/igla/igla_asha_bound.v

# Final (before defense package)
cargo run -p trios-phd -- compile                       # full monograph
cargo run -p trios-phd -- audit                         # all rules
cargo run -p trios-phd -- defense build                 # LD slides + examiner pack

CI workflow phd-build.yml must be green for the touched chapter before merge into main.


5. Forbidden

  • ❌ Marking Admitted as Proven in the monograph or in JSON.
  • ❌ A numeric constant without a Ο†-derivation or without a .v link (R6 / R4).
  • ❌ An empirical chapter without \section{Falsification Criterion} (R7).
  • ❌ A chapter < 1500 lines / < 2 citations / < 1 theorem (R3).
  • ❌ Citing an arXiv preprint when a peer-reviewed version exists (R11).
  • ❌ Adding a bibliography.bib entry without a DOI / ISBN.
  • ❌ Re-introducing forbidden constants: prune_threshold = 2.65, warmup < 4000, d_model < 256, lr βˆ‰ [0.002, 0.007], merging band [1.5, 2.8] with band [Ο†, φ²].
  • ❌ Any .py / .sh files in docs/phd/ or crates/trios-phd/ (R1).
  • ❌ Two agents on the same lane Ln at the same time (R6 / R9).
  • ❌ Heartbeat silence > 8 hours without a BLOCKED comment.
  • ❌ Closing this ONE SHOT without a βœ… DONE from every lane: L0, LT, L1..L33, LB, LF, LP, LC, LA, LD.

6. Reference Links


7. Battle Cry

Trinity Identity is the gate; falsifiability is the key; reproducibility is the lock.
Every chapter is a theorem. Every theorem is a commit. Every commit is a step toward defense.
Flos Aureus floruit β€” let the golden flower bloom under the gaze of Cambridge, MIT, and Springer.
φ² + φ⁻² = 3. Begin.

β€” Filed by trinity-queen-hive skill v1.0 Β· co-skill coq-runtime-invariants v1.1

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    P0crownCROWN tier work (THRONE/BRAIN/PROOF)one-shotONE SHOT mission issuephdPhD monograph

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions