[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-08 #7121
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-15T18:42:18.676Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-08
Overall Coverage
The project maintains strong overall coverage with comprehensive testing across most of the codebase:
This reflects a mature, well-tested codebase with high quality assurance practices.
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
Security-critical components maintain excellent coverage — all core firewall enforcement paths are thoroughly tested:
Key Finding: All domain filtering, network isolation, and container orchestration code is fully covered. The CLI has acceptable coverage with identified gaps in error handling and edge-case paths.
📋 Coverage Table
High-Coverage Directories (>90%)
Low-Coverage Directory (Critical Gap)
🔧 Function Audit
Fully Covered Functions (Security-Critical)
generateSquidConfig()— 100% ✅ Domain ACL rulessetupIptablesRules()— 100% ✅ Network isolationnormalizeAndValidateDomains()— 100% ✅ Domain validationgenerateDockerCompose()— 100% ✅ Container orchestrationPartially Covered Functions
runtime-preflight.ts(66.66% stmts, 41.02% branches) — Enclave preflight validation needs more test casesCritical Gap
finite-disclosure.ts(9.26% stmts, 0.26% branches) ⛔ CRITICAL — Bounded execution module almost entirely untested. This controls execution time limits and resource constraints.📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
No recent commits detected in the 7-day window. The codebase appears stable with no active development in the measured period.
🔎 Notable Findings
Excellent Security Coverage — All critical firewall enforcement paths (Squid config, iptables rules, domain validation) maintain 100% statement and branch coverage. Network isolation logic is well-tested.
Critical Gap in Bounded Execution —
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.tshas only 9.26% statement coverage with nearly 0% branch coverage. This module handles execution time limits and resource constraints — a security-relevant path that should be tested.CLI Edge Cases Unvalidated — While core CLI logic is functional, error handling and recovery paths in
cli.ts(85.71% coverage) lack testing. This affects graceful shutdown and cleanup scenarios.Enclave Preflight Untested —
src/enclave/runtime-preflight.tshas 66.66% statement coverage and only 41.02% branch coverage, indicating incomplete test coverage for enclave validation logic.🎯 Recommendations
High Priority ⛔
src/bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.ts— This module enforces resource limits and execution timeouts, critical for security. Test execution timeout behavior, resource constraint enforcement, and edge cases where limits are exceeded. Target: ≥90% statement coverage.Medium Priority⚠️
src/cli.ts. Focus on SIGTERM/SIGINT handling and partial failure scenarios. Target: ≥95% coverage on error paths.src/enclave/runtime-preflight.tsto ≥80% by testing all validation branches and error conditions for enclave startup.Low Priority i️
Summary
The project demonstrates strong test coverage with excellent security focus. Core firewall components (domain filtering, network isolation, container orchestration) are comprehensively tested. The identified gap in bounded execution (
finite-disclosure.ts) is the primary concern requiring remediation, as it relates to resource constraint enforcement — a security-relevant feature.All reactions