[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Analysis — 2026-08-09 #7162
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-16T20:01:37.759Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-09
Overall Coverage
Excellent foundation: The firewall achieves strong test coverage across the codebase:
File distribution:
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
STRONG PROTECTION ✓ All core security paths are fully tested:
host-iptables-rules.tshost-iptables-shared.tshost-iptables-validation.tsdomain-validation.tsdomain-utils.tsdomain-matchers.tsdocker-manager.tsMinor gaps (non-security blocking):
domain-patterns.tscli.ts📋 Coverage Table
Files with coverage < 80% (sorted by statement coverage):
finite-disclosure.tsruntime-preflight.tspreflight.ts(firecracker)manager.ts(firecracker)firecracker-runtime-backend.ts🔧 Function Audit
Functions with low call coverage:
firecracker-runtime-backend.ts(57.14% functions covered)container-cleanup.ts(80% functions)host-env.ts(100% functions but 85% branches)📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
Files modified in last 7 days with coverage < 85%:
✗
finite-disclosure.ts(9.26%) — Modified 2026-08-09✗
cli.ts(85.71%, 50% branches) — Modified 2026-08-09🔎 Notable Findings
🟢 Security foundations are solid: All network isolation rules (iptables), domain ACLs, and container lifecycle code are fully tested (100%). The critical paths for L7 filtering and L3/L4 blocking have zero gaps.
🔴 Bounded-execution feature incomplete:
finite-disclosure.tsat 9.26% statements suggests this is newly added code without test coverage yet. This is the highest-priority gap and blocks safe usage of the disclosure sandboxing feature.🟡 Firecracker runtime backend undertested: The firecracker VM runtime integration (manager, preflight, runtime-backend) has 57–77% coverage. Given this is an optional advanced feature (not core to Docker-based firewall), this is lower priority than
finite-disclosure.tsbut should be addressed before GA.🟡 CLI entry point has branch coverage gap:
cli.tsat 50% branches indicates one code path (error handler or feature flag conditional) is not exercised. Low functional impact but affects reliability tracing.🎯 Recommendations
finite-disclosure.tscoverage 9.26%cli.tsbranch gap (50%)Report Generated: 2026-08-09 | Total Test Suite: 237 source files | Pass Status: ✓ Core security paths fully covered
All reactions