You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi team! First, thank you for the great work on github/lock.
It would be very helpful if github/lock could have an option to wait until a lock is released, rather than having jobs fail immediately if the lock is active. This feature would allow workflows to pause and retry periodically until the lock is free, helping to prevent jobs from failing and automatically resuming execution once the resource is available.
The configuration could include a wait: true option or an adjustable waiting interval, so users can choose to wait for the lock or fail immediately if they prefer.
If this feature aligns with the roadmap or could be considered, I’d be glad to contribute by submitting a PR to implement it.
Thank you again for your hard work, and I hope this suggestion is helpful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’d be glad to contribute by submitting a PR to implement it
Pull requests are always welcome! This isn't something that I have on my plate to tackle at the moment but I would be happy to accept/review any PRs. Thank you! 🙇
Hi team! First, thank you for the great work on
github/lock
.It would be very helpful if
github/lock
could have an option to wait until a lock is released, rather than having jobs fail immediately if the lock is active. This feature would allow workflows to pause and retry periodically until the lock is free, helping to prevent jobs from failing and automatically resuming execution once the resource is available.The configuration could include a wait: true option or an adjustable waiting interval, so users can choose to wait for the lock or fail immediately if they prefer.
If this feature aligns with the roadmap or could be considered, I’d be glad to contribute by submitting a PR to implement it.
Thank you again for your hard work, and I hope this suggestion is helpful!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: