Replies: 2 comments
-
|
See my idea: #1255 I don't know if this the answer you want but the kind of change you describe is more in the realm of "made a small CR" than a "new feature". Also because if you work with speckit and a coding agent a spec like a login form will have, 99% sure, the requirement to gracefully manage wrong credentials of forgotten passwords, if not in the specify phase for sure the clarify step. But the question remains, a spec change like "show also this field from the database" how it should be managed? I did a proposal... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So I did this. After the implementation I wanted to change the hosting in Azure from Container App to App Service.
Task T166 was the one about creating bicep for hosting in Azure. So I just told Spec Kit to implement that one
Seemed to work fine. After that my spec 001 was done and dusted. I did not have to create a new spec where I changed the hosting from container to app service. I don't know if this is the recommended way of doing it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm not sure about the flow here.
I've run the
/speckit.specify
/speckit.clarify
/speckit.plan
/speckit.tasks
/speckit.analyze and
/speckit.implement commands.
Now here's the thing. Everything looks good, but I have a few things that I want to add to the spec. Let's say I have a login form. When the user enters wrong credentials the form just resets. I want to add a functional requirement that the user should be informed if wrong credentials are entered. I assume when adding that the plan.md and tasks.md must be updated accordingly.
What's the best way to do this? I do not want to create an entire new feature for this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions