-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question: Processes with e+,e- as initial state have xec=0 #32
Comments
I believe you can check the status of the generator by calling print_status. Maybe pre-initialization is skipped because you have only a single subprocess? |
Pre-init is not skipped. And print_status definitly helps: |
If you you the partonic initial state and uniform final state all weights are zero? If so, it is best to use gdb and inspect the pre-initialization phase event-by-event. |
The issue turned out to be that the colour generator wasnt set to uniform. Only the uniform generator seems to work: both the 'summation' and 'flow_sampling' options give errors |
Then this issue qualifies as a bug: if no colored particles participate in the process, summation and flow sampling should just give the 'uncolored' configuration with weight 1. |
I cannot reproduce the reported behavior: e+e- -> ttbar at 600 GeV with RAMBO, uniform helicities and color flow sampling or summation yields a nonzero cross section after pre-initialization on my system. Please post your code (or send it to me) so I can figure out what is going on. |
When I set my incoming state to e+,e- (or some other incoming states, like 'gamma,gamma' or 'W+,W-') my pre-initialised estimated xsec is 0. It does work when i set my initial state to f.i. 'u,ubar'.
I'm working with the SM model with all masses turned on.
I've tried:
-Several different outgoing states (f.i. 'u,u,ubar,ubar', 't,tbar' and '4xgamma')
-With and without electron mass
-The initial_state set to partonic and eplus_eminus
-With and without minimal invariant masses
-With and without ps-cuts
-Different colour/helicity/phase_space-generators
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: