We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think that remove embedded version of yaji and make this a build requirement, is a better idea.
As suggested in a debian bugreport by Bastien Roucariès: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039085
Bugreport with more info on CVEs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040146
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jfyi: There is also unfixed CVE-2023-33460.
lloyd/yajl is unmaintained since long time. I (just) found maintained yajl fork: https://github.com/robohack/yajl/
(Or as alternative fixing method): Patches that Fedora applies to yajl package https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yajl/tree/rawhide
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hello, Thanks for the information.
The path of least resistance is to update the embedded yajl, which I have now done using the robohack fork above.
The Windows build does use an external yajl library, but since I produce the Windows installers, I have to update that too. I will do that next.
No branches or pull requests
I think that remove embedded version of yaji and make this a build requirement, is a better idea.
As suggested in a debian bugreport by Bastien Roucariès:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039085
Bugreport with more info on CVEs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040146
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: