Ruby compile errors on provider

[silfreed]

I cloned the repo a little bit ago after seeing your comment on the puppetlabs bug, but I'm seeing this error when trying to run the provider:

$ ruby -c lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb
lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb:10: syntax error, unexpected kDO, expecting '\n' or ';'
lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb:12: syntax error, unexpected tIDENTIFIER, expecting kEND
        setfacl '-m' perm @resource[:name]
                         ^
lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb:16: syntax error, unexpected kDO, expecting '\n' or ';'
lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb:18: syntax error, unexpected tIDENTIFIER, expecting kEND
        setfacl '-x' perm @resource[:name]
                         ^
lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb:20: syntax error, unexpected kEND, expecting $end
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-12-28 patchlevel 357) [x86_64-linux]

[grooverdan]

its very much work in progress. There are probably lots of these basic syntax errors. I hope to get a chance to clean them up in the next week or two.

I also got a request to put a support the default acl. I'm thinking of doing a defaultpermissions attribute as well. Any options on how this should be presented?

[silfreed]

Sorry; I missed the email from github for some reason.

Just from my light usage of facls I feel like the current permissions attribute should be sufficient; if I knew what was wrong with this ruby and could test it out more ( ;-) ) I could probably tell you a little better since I do have a use for default ACLs.

I noticed the file lib/puppet/provider/acl/postixacl.rb is probably a typo (should be posixacl.rb).

[grooverdan]

thanks for noticing the typo. The bugs are probably a hastily written and poorly testing module rather than your ruby. Feel free to clone the repo and push all the fixes in. When I get around to it I'll take merge requests to fix stuff or if you want to submit it directly to puppetlabs I'm happy with that too. Keep well and thanks for looking.