You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
* first version of Condition
* changed version number to 1.2.0 and status to draft
* nyt eksempel condition
* added new condition instances and a new GP organization instance
* Condition documentation added
* Update StructureDefinition-dk-core-condition-intro.md
* Added NotFollowedAnymore, and asserter. More detailed documentation
* Updated Organization and Patient profiles and removed LPR3-identifier
#74 - removed LPR3-identifier
#73 - added description of 'NNDNK' as identifier.type to DKCorePatient
#72 - added description of selection of SOR and ydernummer to DkCoreOrganization
#69 - removed '(GP's)' from DkCoreOrganization
* Changes made to resolve issue #66 Danish/English names and #67 shorts added to slices and extension
* target audience added to index.md, and scope and usage sections in patient and practioner strengthend to resolve issue #68
* Added section about connection between dk-core and common Danish architectures and standard to resolve issue #71
* Changes applied based on review comments
* Changes to Condition following review, added pregancy example and a female patient
* itemization and display for SCT code corrected
* Added legal text
* Re-fsh'ed
* index description of approvals specified
* Released v2.1.0
Co-authored-by: kirstinerosenbeck <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: tmsMedcom <[email protected]>
Title: "Danish Health Professionals Authorization Identifier"
5
+
Description: "Identifier holding the official [authorization identifier](https://en.stps.dk/en/health-professionals-and-authorities/online-register-registered-health-professionals/) for a practitioner."
6
+
* system 1..
7
+
* system = "https://autregweb.sst.dk" (exactly)
8
+
* value 1..
9
+
* obeys authorization-id-format
10
+
*^maxLength =5
11
+
// WARNING: The constraint index in the following rule (e.g., constraint[0]) may be incorrect.
12
+
// Please compare with the constraint array in the original definition's snapshot and adjust as necessary.
0 commit comments