Task ID or area
Shared Goal Authority / NoKV provider qualification
Intent
I am proposing a new task.
Summary
@huangruiteng, NoKV recently completed a broad recovery pass after its path-native architecture refactor. The consolidated context, restored contracts, and remaining limitations are documented in NoKV-Lab/NoKV#465.
The LoopX shared-coordination RFC and its prerequisite qualification gates have now made enough progress to justify a fresh integration review. Please verify whether the current NoKV HEAD is still a robust candidate for the integration path, and whether the architectural changes introduce any material compatibility, correctness, durability, or operational impact for LoopX.
This should extend the direction tracked in #3245; it should not assume that historical NoKV qualification evidence still applies to the current HEAD.
Proposed scope
In scope:
- Pin the exact LoopX and NoKV revisions used for the review.
- Map the current provider-neutral coordination contract and prerequisite gates to the current NoKV API and recovery model.
- Preserve the file-backed provider as the control, then exercise the same deterministic claim, conflict, retry, original-receipt replay, and stale-generation invariants against the NoKV candidate path.
- Check restart, interruption, ambiguous-response, provider-unavailable, and recovery behavior without weakening LoopX's authority or fail-closed boundaries.
- Classify each result as passed, failed, or unverified, and identify any required adaptation on the LoopX or NoKV side.
- Conclude explicitly whether the refactor has no material integration impact, requires a bounded compatibility change, or blocks promotion.
Out of scope:
- Promoting NoKV to the default provider.
- Moving run history, status, quota, scheduler state, host sessions, or evidence into the coordination provider.
- Weakening provider-neutral gates to accommodate NoKV.
- Starting another broad NoKV refactor or treating this review as production or HA qualification.
Relevant files or commands
Validation plan
- Record the exact LoopX and NoKV SHAs and the selected deployment/recovery profile.
- Run the provider-neutral deterministic suite against the file-backed control and the NoKV candidate.
- Run a bounded live restart/retry qualification for the NoKV path, including durable original-receipt replay and stale-owner rejection.
- Confirm that failure remains fail-closed and does not create a second LoopX authority.
- Publish a compact result matrix with failures, skips, unverified claims, and any manual hold before recommending promotion or compatibility work.
Public/private boundary
Task ID or area
Shared Goal Authority / NoKV provider qualification
Intent
I am proposing a new task.
Summary
@huangruiteng, NoKV recently completed a broad recovery pass after its path-native architecture refactor. The consolidated context, restored contracts, and remaining limitations are documented in NoKV-Lab/NoKV#465.
The LoopX shared-coordination RFC and its prerequisite qualification gates have now made enough progress to justify a fresh integration review. Please verify whether the current NoKV HEAD is still a robust candidate for the integration path, and whether the architectural changes introduce any material compatibility, correctness, durability, or operational impact for LoopX.
This should extend the direction tracked in #3245; it should not assume that historical NoKV qualification evidence still applies to the current HEAD.
Proposed scope
In scope:
Out of scope:
Relevant files or commands
docs/architecture/rfcs/shared-goal-authority-state-provider-v0.mdValidation plan
Public/private boundary