-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Read order in supplementary reads diagram #1666
Comments
I can't help you with interpretation, but read order is just what the name implies. It is the order of the segments in the original (unaligned) read sequence. Of course there are an infinite variety of variations, not everything fits in a simple class. |
Hi Jim, Thank you for your reply. I am afraid the I went back to check the original read sequence before alignment. Here is what I found: For the first 10 characters of the aligned sequence:
its reverse complementary sequence only matched with the last 10 characters of the original read sequence. Whereas for the last 20 characters of the aligned sequence:
its reverse complementary sequence only matched with the first 20 characters of the original read sequence. The first and last segments of original read sequence were:
This means that the original read sequence aligned linearly to the reverse strand of the reference genome, with a large deletion in between. Hence, the I love this Many thanks, |
Hello,
Thank you for developing the
Supplementary Reads Diagram
feature. It is great! :)Could you help me understand how the
Read Order
was determined in IGV (2.19.1), please?Here is a read (approximately 12,870 nt in length) with a primary alignment and a supplementary alignment in the SAM file:
The same read was shown in the Supplementary Reads Diagram` as below:


I can understand the alignment order, which corresponds to what is shown in the SAM file, but I don't understand why the two segments in the read order were flipped.
How should I interpret this read order? Does it imply that the individual who carries this sequence has flipped segments compared with the reference genome? If the answer to this question is yes, does it imply a new type of variation outside inversion and translocation?
If I just looked at the SAM outputs, I would incline to think this read carries a deletion, as the distance between breakpoints on the same strand (approx 116,317 nt) is much larger than the read length itself.
Many thanks,
Min
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: