Skip to content

ConfigFix extracts unsatisfiable formulas on recent versions #1

@ekuiter

Description

@ekuiter

Hi!

I have recently integrated ConfigFix into my tool torte, so I can compare it to KConfigReader and KClause and possibly adapt it to other systems/versions.

Unfortunately ConfigFix is not applicable to the most recent Linux versions anymore. Starting with Linux v6.16, the extracted formula is not satisfiable. I tested with multiple CNF transformations (including the one integrated in ConfigFix) and SAT solvers: 6.17.zip

I reduced the formula to the unsatisfiable core, finding that the following is not satisfiable:

c transform-to-dimacs-with-kconfigreader/extract-kconfig-models-with-configfix/linux/v6.17[x86].dimacs
c 1 ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER_NPC
c 2 ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER_0
c 3 PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER_n
c 4 PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER_0
c 5 PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER_1
c 6 PAGE_BLOCK_MAX_ORDER_10
p cnf 75888 308209
1 0
-2 -1 0
-3 0
2 -4 0
2 -5 0
2 -6 0
3 4 5 6 0

The relevant KConfig code is here: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17/source/mm/Kconfig#L1007

I am no expert when it comes to how ConfigFix encodes prompt/visibility conditions and non-Boolean feature values. Can you tell me what is going on here? It seems that this is either a bug in ConfigFix that wasn't triggered in earlier versions, or that the semantics of KConfig have had a breaking change since Linux 6.15.

Looking forward to your feedback!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions