You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are trying to convert the generated point clouds (under the folder experiments/shapenet_cars_pretrained/evaluation/generation/) to mesh using the ball pivoting algorithm. However, we found that it is very difficult to obtain high-quality meshing results. We use the ball pivoting algorithm provided by MeshLab. When the radius is large, e.g. 0.05, the reconstructed mesh is incomplete. However, if a small radius, e.g. 0.01, is used, though the reconstructed surface is more complete, there exist a lot of artifacts and the surface normals are not consistent.
The results are shown below:
Reconstruction result using radius = 0.05
Reconstruction result using radius = 0.01
Could you provide more details on how you generate mesh from the point cloud? Or could you share your code of point-to-mesh conversion?
Since we are trying to compare your work in our paper, we would like to ensure our comparison is fair.
Thank you for your response in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this script too slow? It seems that for the generated point cloud, even if we downsample it to 200k points. It still need nearly 30+ mins to finish the conversion on my macbook. Is it expected?
Hi @jchibane ,
Thanks for sharing the amazing work!
We are trying to convert the generated point clouds (under the folder experiments/shapenet_cars_pretrained/evaluation/generation/) to mesh using the ball pivoting algorithm. However, we found that it is very difficult to obtain high-quality meshing results. We use the ball pivoting algorithm provided by MeshLab. When the radius is large, e.g. 0.05, the reconstructed mesh is incomplete. However, if a small radius, e.g. 0.01, is used, though the reconstructed surface is more complete, there exist a lot of artifacts and the surface normals are not consistent.
The results are shown below:
Reconstruction result using radius = 0.05

Reconstruction result using radius = 0.01

Could you provide more details on how you generate mesh from the point cloud? Or could you share your code of point-to-mesh conversion?
Since we are trying to compare your work in our paper, we would like to ensure our comparison is fair.
Thank you for your response in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: