Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on a PocketBase app category? #20

Open
benallfree opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Thoughts on a PocketBase app category? #20

benallfree opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@benallfree
Copy link

benallfree commented Jun 23, 2023

PocketBase has gained tremendous popularity and momentum in the past year (~25k github stars). It's a great micro-backend that I think aligns with the spirit of js13k.

Here's my proposal, and I'd be happy to discuss or put a repo together:

  • 13k limit for combined frontend and backend logic, and any seed data/assets. Initial data schema migrations are free.
  • Repo includes Dockerfile to build the server AND create a zip file to prove all starting assets are <13k. Dockerfile is not allowed to be modified.
  • Deploy Dockerfile anywhere, but fly.io has a strong free tier and is recommended
  • Unlimited persistent storage for user-generated content (ie, we don't attempt to track this)
  • Official PocketBase JS SDK is free

I think this would be a great category because it would support a fantastic open source project and also modernize the server category to be more aligned with current tooling and deployment approaches.

Disclaimer: I run pockethost.io.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant