Thank you for your interest in contributing to dev-cli-arsenal! This project thrives because of contributors like you. Whether you're fixing bugs, adding new tools, improving documentation, or sharing feedback, every contribution matters.
- Code of Conduct
- How to Contribute
- Types of Contributions
- Development Setup
- Submitting Changes
- Style Guidelines
- Review Process
- Recognition
This project adheres to our Code of Conduct. By participating, you agree to uphold this code. Please report unacceptable behavior to the project maintainers.
- Star the repository ⭐ to show your support
- Fork the repository to your GitHub account
- Clone your fork locally
- Create a feature branch for your changes
- Make your changes following our guidelines
- Test your changes thoroughly
- Submit a pull request with a clear description
# Fork the repository on GitHub, then:
# Clone your fork
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/dev-cli-arsenal.git
cd dev-cli-arsenal
# Add upstream remote
git remote add upstream https://github.com/kenzycodex/dev-cli-arsenal.git
# Create a feature branch
git checkout -b feature/your-feature-name
# Install dependencies (if any)
npm install
# Make your changes...
# Test your changes
npm test
# Commit your changes
git add .
git commit -m "feat: add awesome new CLI tool"
# Push to your fork
git push origin feature/your-feature-name
# Create a Pull Request on GitHubBefore adding a tool, please ensure it:
- Is actively maintained (updated within the last 12 months)
- Provides genuine value to developers
- Has a stable installation method
- Doesn't duplicate existing functionality without clear benefits
- Is production-ready and well-documented
Tool Entry Format:
| **tool-name** | `command example` | Brief description (max 60 chars) | `installation command` |Required Information:
- Name: Clear, recognizable tool name
- Command: Most common usage example
- Description: Concise explanation of what it does
- Installation: Working installation command
- Category: Appropriate section placement
We welcome performance comparisons and benchmarks:
- Tool speed comparisons
- Memory usage analysis
- Installation time measurements
- File size comparisons
- Fix typos and grammatical errors
- Improve existing descriptions
- Add usage examples
- Create workflow guides
- Update installation instructions
- Add troubleshooting sections
When reporting bugs, please include:
- Description: Clear description of the issue
- Steps to reproduce: Detailed reproduction steps
- Expected behavior: What should happen
- Actual behavior: What actually happens
- Environment: OS, Node.js version, etc.
- Screenshots: If applicable
Use our bug report template.
For new features or enhancements:
- Check existing issues to avoid duplicates
- Clearly describe the feature and its benefits
- Provide use cases and examples
- Consider implementation complexity
Use our feature request template.
- Node.js (v16 or higher)
- npm (v8 or higher)
- Git (latest version)
# Install development dependencies
npm install
# Run verification tests
npm run verify
# Run linting
npm run lint
# Format code
npm run format
# Generate documentation
npm run docs
# Run all checks
npm run check-allBefore submitting:
# Test tool installation
./scripts/verify-tools.js
# Validate README format
npm run validate-readme
# Check for broken links
npm run check-links
# Run security audit
npm audit
# Verify cross-platform compatibility
npm run test-platforms- Length: Maximum 60 characters
- Style: Descriptive, not promotional
- Focus: What the tool does, not why it's amazing
- Consistency: Follow existing patterns
Good examples:
- ✅ "Ultra-fast package manager detector"
- ✅ "Cross-platform rm -rf alternative"
- ✅ "Auto-restart Node.js applications"
Avoid:
- ❌ "The best and fastest tool ever!"
- ❌ "Revolutionary game-changing utility"
- ❌ "Must-have tool for all developers"
- Accuracy: Test on multiple platforms
- Completeness: Include all necessary steps
- Clarity: Use the most common installation method
- Updates: Keep installation commands current
Place tools in the most appropriate category:
- Package Managers & Installation Tools
- File & Directory Operations
- Development Servers & Networking
- Process Management & Monitoring
- Code Quality & Formatting
- Build Tools & Bundlers
- Testing & Debugging
- Security & Analysis
- Productivity & Utilities
- Fun & Customization
- Git & Repository Tools
- Mobile & Cross-Platform
- Network & Performance
- Data & Analytics
We follow Conventional Commits:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer]
Types:
feat: New feature or tool additionfix: Bug fix or correctiondocs: Documentation changesstyle: Code style changes (formatting, etc.)refactor: Code refactoringtest: Adding or modifying testschore: Maintenance tasks
Examples:
feat: add esbuild to build tools category
fix: correct installation command for ripgrep on Ubuntu
docs: improve setup instructions for Windows users
chore: update tool verification script- Clear Title: Descriptive title explaining the change
- Detailed Description: Explain what and why you changed
- Testing: Include evidence of testing
- Documentation: Update relevant documentation
- Single Purpose: One feature/fix per PR
Our maintainers review PRs based on:
- Accuracy: Installation commands work correctly
- Quality: Tool provides genuine value
- Maintenance: Tool is actively maintained
- Documentation: Clear and helpful descriptions
- Consistency: Follows project standards
- Testing: Changes are properly tested
- Initial Response: Within 48 hours
- Review Completion: Within 1 week
- Feedback Address: Within 2 weeks
All contributors are recognized in:
- GitHub contributors graph
- Release notes for significant contributions
- Annual contributor highlights
- Special mentions for exceptional contributions
- Tool Contributors: Added valuable new tools
- Documentation Heroes: Improved guides and docs
- Bug Hunters: Found and fixed important issues
- Performance Experts: Provided benchmarks and optimizations
- Community Builders: Helped other contributors
We track and celebrate:
- Number of tools added
- Documentation improvements
- Bug fixes and enhancements
- Community engagement
- Fix typos in documentation
- Update outdated installation commands
- Add missing tool descriptions
- Improve existing tool descriptions
- Add new tools to existing categories
- Create installation verification scripts
- Write platform-specific guides
- Benchmark tool performance
- Create new tool categories
- Build automated testing systems
- Develop interactive installers
- Design tool comparison matrices
- GitHub Issues: Bug reports and feature requests
- GitHub Discussions: General questions and ideas
- Pull Request Comments: Specific implementation discussions
For urgent matters or private concerns, contact the maintainers through GitHub.
Your contributions make dev-cli-arsenal better for developers worldwide. Whether you're adding a single tool or making major improvements, we appreciate your time and effort.
Happy Contributing! 🚀
This contributing guide is inspired by open-source best practices and is continuously improved based on community feedback.