Skip to content

Add harness-gap loop: regressions must produce regression tests #4

@kofort9

Description

@kofort9

Context

From Ryan Carson's Code Factory analysis (reflection note).

production regression → harness gap issue → test case added → SLA tracked

Every bug becomes a test case, so the system's coverage compounds over time.

Current State

Bugs become GH issues, and auto-dev creates PRs with tests. But there's no formal loop ensuring every production regression specifically results in a regression test. It happens ad hoc.

Implementation

  • When a bug is found in production, label it regression in addition to bug
  • Nightshift enforces that regression-labeled PRs must include a test reproducing the original failure
  • Track regression-to-test SLA (time from regression filed to test merged)

Priority

Medium — can implement alongside current pipeline

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions