Use torch.svd_lowrank for large matrices in resize_lora.py
#2240
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This hugely reduces the time to prune a LoRA, without visible quality loss compared to the full SVD. The time is reduced from 3 hours (Wan) and 1 hour (Qwen-Image) to a few seconds on my laptop.
See https://docs.pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.svd_lowrank.html for details. Maybe we can increase
niterfor even better quality but I think the defaultniter=2already gives good enough quality. Kijai'sLoraExtractKJnode usesniter=7by default, see https://github.com/kijai/ComfyUI-KJNodes/blob/bb205d809b467307b8ec3bb1a22680a4873187f8/nodes/lora_nodes.py#L30 (but they don't yet do adaptive rank after svd_lowrank)