Skip to content

3178 get attestation#493

Merged
FayeSGW merged 5 commits intomainfrom
3178-get-attestation
May 16, 2025
Merged

3178 get attestation#493
FayeSGW merged 5 commits intomainfrom
3178-get-attestation

Conversation

@FayeSGW
Copy link
Contributor

@FayeSGW FayeSGW commented May 16, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@sami-alajrami sami-alajrami left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think --flow and --trail are always required (trail can be not required if --fignerprint is provided)

  • attestation name can include dot notation for artifact-name.attestation-name
  • fingerprint is optional. if provided, the latest artifact with that fingerprint in the flow is used (no need for a trail, but maybe it can be considered if provided?)

@FayeSGW FayeSGW merged commit ee5af0c into main May 16, 2025
9 checks passed
@FayeSGW FayeSGW deleted the 3178-get-attestation branch May 16, 2025 12:29
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
* Add get attestation command

* Add tests

* Fix lint and add more text for docs

* Small text change

* Remove reference to short fingerprint from description
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments