Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the self-hosted runner configurable as the workflow's options #41

Closed
gyohuangxin opened this issue Mar 14, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

Current Behavior

We had an implementation of running SMP on self-hosted runner #39 , but the configuration of self-hosted runner is hardcoded as "c3.small.x86".

Desired Behavior

We should make self-hosted runner configurable as the workflow's options, e.g. server type, location......

Implementation

Acceptance Tests

Mockups


Contributor Guide

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 28, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Apr 28, 2022
@leecalcote
Copy link
Member

Is this still an open need?

@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Apr 28, 2022
@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member Author

@leecalcote I think yes, this issue is to make machine type can be configurable rather than hardcoding as "c3.small.x86".
@hershd23 If you're around, can you look at this?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 19, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jun 19, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 29, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jun 29, 2022
@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin reopened this Jun 30, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jun 30, 2022
@leecalcote
Copy link
Member

Thank you for reopening.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 9, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Sep 9, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 21, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 21, 2022
@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin reopened this Sep 21, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Sep 21, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 12, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Nov 12, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 22, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants