Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable other service meshes performance tests #51

Closed
4 tasks
gyohuangxin opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Enable other service meshes performance tests #51

gyohuangxin opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member

gyohuangxin commented May 12, 2022

Current Behavior

We have included Istio, Linkerd, OSM performance tests.

Desired Behavior

We should enable other service meshes performance tests listed on https://smp-spec.io/dashboard.

  • Consul
  • App Mesh
  • Kuma
  • Cilium

Implementation

Writing bash scripts for each mesh is time consuming, so we should use mesheryctl to deploy them.
And we should use mesheryctl app onboard to deploy sample apps if #48 is readay.

Acceptance Tests

Mockups


Contributor Guide

@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin added the kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature label May 12, 2022
@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin self-assigned this May 12, 2022
@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member Author

@leecalcote Does it work to use mesheryctl to deploy above meshes now?
@hershd23 I will appreciate it if you can do me a favor on this.

@leecalcote
Copy link
Member

Tagging @piyushsingariya @hexxdump @gr455 to speak to this first question. It should.

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member Author

@leecalcote Great!

@gyohuangxin
Copy link
Member Author

Is mesheryctl app onboard ready for sample applications of above meshes? Where is their yaml files?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 29, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jun 29, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 12, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 12, 2022
@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin reopened this Jul 12, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Jul 12, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 9, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Sep 9, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 21, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 21, 2022
@gyohuangxin gyohuangxin reopened this Sep 21, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Sep 21, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 12, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Nov 12, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 22, 2022

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants