Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
Not convincing.
Who is going to supply this information? There is already insufficient validation of updates, insufficient validation of installation order control and exported usage, insufficient validation of supported platforms and insufficient upstreaming of patches. Plus occasional circumventing of upstream build systems, making vpckg non-representative for the given ports. However, once you publish a well researched database, it might work the other way: port maintainers might be willing to check if the vcpkg port doesn't lag behind. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just take the CI file list and check if the required files for module support are there? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi 👋,
I'm the developer of arewemodulesyet.org that heavily relies on vcpkg to track the most popular open source packages (based on update count of the portfile). Now, there are some things I would like to see added to the vcpkg.json that would make at least my life easier:
LibraryX
cannot be used in a modules project (Often due to bugs in the compiler, for example see this issue)LibraryX
can be used in a modules projectLibraryX
itself is a modules projectLibraryX
dependencies are modulesLibraryX
uses C++23 import std;LibraryX
dependencies are using C++23 import std;Cheers,
Eli
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions