Skip to content

Standardizing the use of Markdown and LaTeX for the documentation layer #3636

@casella

Description

@casella

Follow up of modelica/ModelicaStandardLibrary#3122 in the proper place, i.e., MAP-Lang:

Regarding OpenModelica I'm a bit hesitant at investing resources to implement a feature that is not standardized, just by reverse-engineering other tools. But I am definitely in favour of adding this feature to the standard, and I would definitely go ahead with the implementation and with an MCP if there is some consensus that this should be standardized. That would also provide two test implementations, which I understand is a (de-facto?) requirement for adding two language feature to the spec.

What do the other tool vendors think? I guess DS is fine with that, since they implemented it already. What about Wolfram, MapleSoft, and ESI?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions