Skip to content

Conversation

@HansOlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #3772
It explains the existing use of n+0.

I use "should" to not discuss the edge-cases, in particular:

  • Unused connectorSizing-variable could perhaps be used in a base-class, but it seems odd to me (how do you know that you will have such a connector without knowing name and type?)
  • Multiple vector of connectors using n will work in some cases, but not in all cases.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson requested a review from henrikt-ma November 3, 2025 15:11
Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
@henrikt-ma
Copy link
Collaborator

My suggested changes to the non-normative paragraph should have converged now.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson requested a review from henrikt-ma November 5, 2025 15:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <[email protected]>
@HansOlsson HansOlsson merged commit 3daf6fb into modelica:master Nov 28, 2025
1 check passed
@HansOlsson HansOlsson deleted the ConnectorSizingP0 branch November 28, 2025 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sensible interpretation of connectorSizing tied to several connectors?

2 participants