You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This will be closer to the definition of the word collapse.
Not really. If you collapse a real world object, it doesn't shrink to an infinitesimal point, it just goes into its "smallest state". To me, collapsing to minSize seems intuitive and correct. If I want the pane to collapse to zero then I'll set 0 as the min size.
I suspect this is one of those situations where either version of the function will be correct for some use cases and incorrect for others.
In my point of view, collapse should resize to 0 even if the minSize is superior. The minSize should affect the size when dragging/resizing only.
Then we could use the collapse function to hide the pane while assuring that it wont be smaller than the minSize when visible.
This will be closer to the definition of the word collapse.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: