NETOBSERV-2146: Add support for Gateway API

[leandroberetta]

Description

Add support for Gateway API.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[openshift-ci-robot]

@leandroberetta: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2146 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

Add support for Gateway API.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
• If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
• If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
• If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
• Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
• Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
• No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign oliviercazade for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 53.59%. Comparing base (a593dd9) to head (b4c216a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
web/src/utils/k8s-models-hook.ts	42.85%	3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
web/src/components/netflow-traffic-tab.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ents/tabs/netflow-topology/2d/styles/styleNode.tsx	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1119      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.60%   53.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       10513    10526      +13     
  Branches     1301     1304       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         5635     5641       +6     
- Misses       4362     4368       +6     
- Partials      516      517       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	55.87% <50.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittests	47.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...nents/tabs/netflow-topology/peer-resource-link.tsx	84.61% <100.00%> (+4.61%)	⬆️
...ents/tabs/netflow-topology/2d/styles/styleNode.tsx	26.92% <0.00%> (-0.53%)	⬇️
web/src/components/netflow-traffic-tab.tsx	54.92% <0.00%> (-1.60%)	⬇️
web/src/utils/k8s-models-hook.ts	82.69% <42.85%> (-6.20%)	⬇️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[leandroberetta]

@jotak I addressed the feedback.

[jotak]

LGTM