The latest version (4.9.0) appears to restrict functionality in the prebuilt container image. Advanced features and certain environment variables now require an unlock code.
I want to provide clear feedback: I do not like this direction, and I believe it is the wrong approach for this project.
One of the main advantages of container-db-backup has been that it provides a flexible and transparent self-hosted backup solution. Restricting existing configuration options in the publicly available image introduces unnecessary friction, complicates upgrades, and makes the project less suitable for automated and reproducible deployments.
This is particularly problematic for a backup tool, where reliability, predictable configuration, and long-term maintainability are essential.
I understand the need to fund ongoing development, but limiting the functionality of the prebuilt image is, in my opinion, the wrong trade-off. Paid support, sponsorships, consulting, or additional enterprise services would be preferable to restricting core configuration functionality.
Please reconsider this decision and provide a fully functional community image without feature restrictions.
The latest version (4.9.0) appears to restrict functionality in the prebuilt container image. Advanced features and certain environment variables now require an unlock code.
I want to provide clear feedback: I do not like this direction, and I believe it is the wrong approach for this project.
One of the main advantages of container-db-backup has been that it provides a flexible and transparent self-hosted backup solution. Restricting existing configuration options in the publicly available image introduces unnecessary friction, complicates upgrades, and makes the project less suitable for automated and reproducible deployments.
This is particularly problematic for a backup tool, where reliability, predictable configuration, and long-term maintainability are essential.
I understand the need to fund ongoing development, but limiting the functionality of the prebuilt image is, in my opinion, the wrong trade-off. Paid support, sponsorships, consulting, or additional enterprise services would be preferable to restricting core configuration functionality.
Please reconsider this decision and provide a fully functional community image without feature restrictions.