Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping of fields (core: catalogue2, properties) and ontology properties (Marmotta) doesn't exist #11

Open
marcofranke opened this issue Jun 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
data schema Related to the NIMBLE ontology and generated cores/index very high priority
Milestone

Comments

@marcofranke
Copy link

The property values of a specific product are contained in index/core catalogue2. There, a product has for each property value a field. For example, item_name or item_price. This fields have to linkage to the properties of the corresponding ontology concepts. That means, the field item_name could be the datatype property name of a chair but it is defined. In conclusion, there is no mapping possible.

I propose to have an additional field in catalogue2 or properties to add a tuple (field name in core catalogue2, property name in core properties). Then, we could create a Entity Mapping Service in catalogue-search

@marcofranke marcofranke added very high priority data schema Related to the NIMBLE ontology and generated cores/index labels Jun 5, 2018
@marcofranke marcofranke added this to the Release 3.0 milestone Jun 5, 2018
@iot365
Copy link
Member

iot365 commented Jun 12, 2018

We will create another dynamic field that uses all item_properties as it's name to get this mapping into the index. We also need to include the "dimensions" in the item_properties (like cac:GoodsItem / cac:Item / cac: Dimension), to also cover the dimension properties.
The properties should include both, custom properties and "standard" properties.

@marcofranke
Copy link
Author

marcofranke commented Jun 13, 2018 via email

@iot365
Copy link
Member

iot365 commented Jun 13, 2018

I would rather take the Name instead of the URI, but I can discuss that with @dglachs tomorrow.

@dglachs
Copy link
Member

dglachs commented Jun 28, 2018

Depends on #13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data schema Related to the NIMBLE ontology and generated cores/index very high priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants