Aerodynamic jump

[gambon2010]

If I am not mistaken the results of the current version of this library doesn't factor in the 'aerodynamic jump' (not sure if that's what its called in English). The calculations for this seem somewhat simple, I could work on adding it to this library if it is pertinent.

@dbookstaber @o-murphy

[dbookstaber]

Yes! I actually have this as a feature note on my fork but haven't gotten to it, so it would be great if you can do it.

[gambon2010]

I'll look into implementing this in the next two weeks.

[o-murphy]

@dbookstaber @gambon2010

There is the recommendations for new features adding process. We have to save backwards compatibility until major version still 2.x.x, so all new features must be implemented as optional and side by side with existing.

#32 (comment)

[o-murphy]

also please be correspond with new contribution terms

#86