Should Semantic Conventions include well known event names as consts?

[jay-dee7]

We already have well known attributes defined in the opentelemetry-semantic-conventions and that's super helpful for observability vendors.

I was wondering if it would make sense to also include event.name items also within this crate?
For example for exceptions, we have a requirement of event.name = exception as mentioned here - https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/exceptions/exceptions-spans/#exception-event

I do get it that it's quite trivial to handle but IMO, this would be a nice addition.
If this makes any sense, I'd love to compile a list of known event names and share them here along with a PR.

Thanks :)

[jay-dee7]

The Go version of semconv does include event names:

• https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.38.0/semconv/v1.37.0/exception.go#L6