-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 587
fix: make shutdown_with_timeout required on LogProcessor
#3133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
lalitb
merged 5 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
davidhewitt:dh/log-shutdown-with-timeout
Oct 28, 2025
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3057685
make `shutdown_with_timeout` required on `LogProcessor`
davidhewitt b49ee41
fix even more cases
davidhewitt 9803d0c
don't remove the default implementation of `shutdown_with_timeout`
davidhewitt dc1ba71
Merge branch 'main' into dh/log-shutdown-with-timeout
lalitb 2432f92
Merge branch 'main' into dh/log-shutdown-with-timeout
lalitb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we cannot make this change, as this is breaking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I documented it in the changelog as breaking, am fully aware.
I defend it as a good change because as evidenced here there are existing bugs in production where implementations got that wrong.
The span processor trait does not have this implementation, so removing it improves consistency too.
But if you prefer I can close the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logs (and Metrics) SDK were declared stable, so we should not make any breaking change.
(trace/span sdk is beta, so we can fix anything there.)
Given we can't make breaking change, only option is to better document this so custom processor authors' won't make the mistake!
The existing bug (in this repo) is in an experimental component only right?
Let's fix the bug by implementing the right shutdown method in log_processor - that should be a good fix and no breaking change issues.
Agree it's not great. IIRC, we did have some discussions about providing default implementations before declaring stable, and ended up with a less-than-ideal choice :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understood. I'll aim to come back to this PR probably on Monday.
Unfortunately when running this change I found it also affects
SimpleLogProcessor.https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust/pull/3133/files#diff-834c43f0e4972291eea6782a3ebf19e9b93f150d0b699dd5991f2ff52dc9c1fcR120
Ouch.
I guess we can document that
shutdownusually should not be implemented andshutdown_with_timeoutshould be? Can we change the default implementation ofshutdown_with_timeoutto log a warning? Or is that still too breaking?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding a log is fine. It is not common for users to write processors that require implementing any of these.. Most use cases are around enrichment (adding more attributes), and they don't need to worry about shutdown method at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed a commit which re-adds this default implementation with an internal warning log.