Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Could you explain issue_introduction.patch? #62

Open
js-d opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Could you explain issue_introduction.patch? #62

js-d opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@js-d
Copy link

js-d commented Mar 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I noticed that 178 out of 381 issues in the issues/ folder have an empty revert_command.txt and instead have an issue_introduction.patch.

Do these patches reflect actual historical states of the Expensify repo, or were they created post hoc? The paper mentions doing something similar in Appendix A.11, but I think only for the held out set?

Could you clarify what's different between issues that have an issue_introduction.patch and issues that don't?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@js-d