You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, I really like this library, it works well and fast. Thanks for maintaining.
I am using it to calculate paths in a self-recorded network. After some adjustments to the network, it does what we need.
However, when I add one-way features, I cannot get a path if the destination is on that one-way feature. The start can be placed on it and it works. Also, the one-way feature is included for "through" paths that have a working destination.
My features can have a "oneway" property that is set to true if the feature should be one-way. I do not use the "backward" value at the moment. If I remove the "oneway" property, I can place the destination on the feature with no issue.
Any guidance would be dearly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, you can try this out on your example page by putting the destination "B" on Road "Oscarsleden" - which is a road with separated lanes for each direction:
However, this road is part of the network and can be used for "passing-through" if you put your destination on a two-way road:
First off, I really like this library, it works well and fast. Thanks for maintaining.
I am using it to calculate paths in a self-recorded network. After some adjustments to the network, it does what we need.
However, when I add one-way features, I cannot get a path if the destination is on that one-way feature. The start can be placed on it and it works. Also, the one-way feature is included for "through" paths that have a working destination.
I am using this weightFunction:
My features can have a "oneway" property that is set to true if the feature should be one-way. I do not use the "backward" value at the moment. If I remove the "oneway" property, I can place the destination on the feature with no issue.
Any guidance would be dearly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: