Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

General Issue: Handling of CR -> PR #161

Closed
bundfussr opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

General Issue: Handling of CR -> PR #161

bundfussr opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
ADRS Discussion Action or process of talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas. ON HOLD Programming

Comments

@bundfussr
Copy link
Collaborator

Background Information

Can we design our functions such that the case CR->PR can be handled without the need to implement a company-/study-specific function?

We agree that this case is a data issue. But not be able to handle it within admiralonco forces users to implement company- or study specific functions. Once these are available they will most likely be used also for reporting events or studies where the case does not occur.

As it affects the design of the admiralonco functions, it is related to #45 and #12 and discussion on how to select assessments up to PD.

Definition of Done

Decision on how CR->PR is handled in admiralonco.

@bundfussr bundfussr added Discussion Action or process of talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas. Programming ADRS labels Sep 15, 2022
@bundfussr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

derive_extreme_event() provides enough flexibility to handle this case.

Thus this issue can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ADRS Discussion Action or process of talking about something in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas. ON HOLD Programming
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants