Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enable Vector valued coupling #9

Open
arvedes opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Enable Vector valued coupling #9

arvedes opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@IshaanDesai

Comments

@arvedes
Copy link
Contributor

arvedes commented Apr 29, 2022

Currently, the adapter is only working with scalar-valued data. For vector valued data there is currently a "not tested" error.
@BenjaminRodenberg
Copy link
Member

In #15 we removed support for vector valued data. We are now raising an exception. Adding support for vector valued data is still on the agenda but not necessary for our first, simple test (partitioned heat equation).

@BenjaminRodenberg BenjaminRodenberg mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2022
Merged
BenjaminRodenberg added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2023
@PhilipHildebrand @IshaanDesai
@BenjaminRodenberg @arvedes
Develop minimal working version without support for parallel runs and…
955b964 
… vector-valued functions (#15)

* Remove parallelization (see #22) 
* Remove PointSources (see #24)
* Remove tests and support for vector functions (#9)
* Remove parallelization (see #22)
* Update tests.
* Remove nearest projection.
* Working version with partitioned heat equation.
* Update CI
* update to doflinx v0.4.1 (should also work with v0.5.2)

Co-authored-by: Ishaan Desai <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Rodenberg <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arved Enders-Seidlitz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@IshaanDesai IshaanDesai

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@BenjaminRodenberg @IshaanDesai @arvedes