-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
docs: In the plot_feature_importance
example, rename the features after preprocessing
#1421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@sylvaincom what names would you like? |
I'd change all the "kmeans" to "geospatial" as suggested by @ogrisel. I'll add more information in the parent issue soon. |
I just updated the parent issue, let me know if you have further suggestions |
Hi @sylvaincom , @auguste-probabl ! |
Good luck @Muhammad-Rebaal, let us know if you need anything! |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Which part of the documentation needs improvement?
plot_feature_importance
exampleDescribe the problem found in the documentation
The feature names after complex feature engineering is not easily understandle. It would be nice to rename the features.
Currently (v0.8.2), we have:
Suggested improvement
kmeans__*
should be renamed intogeospatial__*
to make it clearer. Indeed the K-Means is applied only to the 2 geospatial features.remainder__
* prefixes can be deleted as they are not necessary.Additional context
I am open to suggestions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: