[Implementers’ doc] [Authors’ doc]
Global References:
By using columns, content can flow from one column to another, and the number of columns can vary depending on the size of the viewport. The specification was originally designed to replace table-based multicolumn layout.
You can declare a multicolumn layout with one line of CSS:
body {
column-width: 15em;
}
Or
body {
column-count: 2;
}
Or
body {
columns: 2 15em;
}
Multi-column layout introduces a new type of container between the content box and the content: the column box. This is a significant departure from the traditional box model.
The content of a multicol element is flowed into column boxes, which are arranged into rows, like table cells (inline direction). Consequently:
- column width is the length of the column box in the inline direction;
- column height is the height of the column box in the block direction;
- all column boxes in a row have the same column width and column height;
- adjacent column boxes are separated by a column gap, which may contain a column rule;
- all column gaps (and column rules) in the same row are equal;
- column rules only appear between columns that both have content.
Critical shortcomings can be pointed out in the column box model:
- it is not possible to set properties/values on column boxes, which is why you can’t set the background of one specific column;
- the column box has no concept of padding, margin or borders;
- column boxes don’t establish containing blocks for elements with
position: fixed || absolute
; - multicol elements with column heights larger than the viewport may pose accessibility issues.
However, floats inside multi-column layouts are positioned with regard to the column box where they appear.
Finally, since a multi-column element establishes a new block formatting context, a top margin set on the first child element will not collapse with the margins of the multicol element.
Basically, two properties determine the width of columns:
column-count
;column-width
.
A third one, columns
, is a shorthand which sets both.
This property describes the width of columns in multicol elements.
Its values can be:
auto
, which means the column width will be determined by other properties (column-count
if set);<length>
, which describes the optimal column width.
The actual column width may be wider (to fill the available space), or narrower. But the column width can only be narrower if the available space is smaller that the specified column width.
- To ensure that
column-width
can be used with vertical text, column width means the length of the line boxes inside the columns. - To set an exact column width, all length values (
width
,column-width
, andcolumn-gap
) must be specified.
This property describes the number of columns of a multicol element.
Its values can be:
auto
, which means the number of columns will be determined by other properties (column-width
if set);<integer>
, which describes the optimal number of columns into which the content of the element will be flowed.
It is important to note that if both ‘column-width’ and ‘column-count’ have non-auto values, the integer value describes the maximum number of columns.
This is the shorthand property for setting column-width
and column-count
. Omitted values are set to their initial values (auto
).
The pseudo-algorithm below determines the used values for column-count
(N) and column-width
(W). There is one other variable in the pseudo-algorithm: the used width of the multi-column element (U).
The used width of the multi-column element (U) can depend on the element’s contents, in which case it also depends on the computed values of the column-count
and column-width
properties. The specification does not define how U is calculated.
(01) if ((column-width = auto) and (column-count = auto)) then
(02) exit; /* not a multicol element */
(03) if column-width = auto then
(04) N := column-count
(05) else if column-count = auto then
(06) N := max(1,
(07) floor((U + column-gap)/(column-width + column-gap)))
(08) else
(09) N := min(column-count, max(1,
(10) floor((U + column-gap)/(column-width + column-gap))))
(11) W := max(0, ((U + column-gap)/N - column-gap))
What is important to understand there is that the column-width
can either be a floor or a ceiling, depending on the value of column-count
.
Let’s take some examples.
/* Condition starting at line 3 applies */
body {
column-width: auto;
column-count: 2;
}
The column width is not set, it entirely depends on column-count
and column-gap
(which suggested default is 1em
).
Columns theoretically have a floor (which is suggested to be 1px
or less) and a ceiling (line 11).
/* Condition starting at line 5 applies */
body {
column-width: 300px;
column-count: auto;
}
In this example, the number of columns is computed depending on the column width and gap.
In other words, the column width is a ceiling: it can’t be larger than 300px
but can shrink if the available width is less.
/* Condition starting at line 8 applies */
body {
column-width: 300px;
column-count: 2;
}
In this example, the column width is a floor: if 2 columns (2 × column width and the gap) can fit, column-count
will be honored, else column-width
grows to the width available. If there is additional width available when 2 columns fit, column-width
will grow as well.
It’s worth noting that the used value for column-count
is calculated without regard for explicit column breaks or constrained column heights, while the actual value takes these into consideration.
Column boxes do not establish new stacking contexts.
What is important is that column gaps take up space while column rules don’t.
- column gaps will push apart content in adjacent columns (within the same multicol element);
- if there is a column rule between columns, it will appear in the middle of the gap.
As regards column rules:
- they are painted just above the background of the multicol element so that child elements with
z-index
values to be on top of column rules; - they are only drawn between two columns that both have content.
This has been moved to the CSS Fragmentation module.
When a page or column break splits a box, the box’s margins, borders, and paddings have no visual effect where the split occurs. It is important to remark outline
and box-shadow
are not discussed at all in the spec.
In the previous spec, it was stated that “the margin immediately after a forced page or column break will be preserved” but that isn’t necessarily the case in practice, CSS authors often having to resolve to padding-top
to force a margin after a page break.
From experience, avoiding a break-inside
elements flowing in 2 or 3 columns can also be problematic (the element vertical alignment is completely off).
You can only span all columns or none. It is not possible to declare an <integer>
.
An element establishes a new block formatting context if its column-span
is set to all
. In other words, column-span
kind of resets the flow to the first column.
We may not necessarily worry about this (in authors’ CSS) because the User Agent can treat it as column-span: none
if it can’t find room to make the element spanning. Constraining the height of columns should be enough to prevent a column span, especially with overflow.
By default, columns will be balanced (minimal variation in column length), they won’t be filled sequentially.
This default can be overridden with
body {
column-fill: auto;
}
It’s worth noting User Agents should try to honor widows
and orphans
in any case.
What is important to remark is that:
- content that extends into column gaps is not clipped to the column box;
- a multicol element can have more columns that it has room for, additional column boxes are created in the inline direction (page or column break, constrained height, etc.);
- columns that appear outside the multicol element are called overflow columns.
CSS multicol relies on a complex (fragmentation) logic, and this logic varies for each browser.
In Blink and Webkit for instance, a reflow won’t happen for the document (:root
) if we don’t force a reflow at the body
level. As a consequence, we’re using the --RS__defaultLineLength
CSS variable to force this reflow and slightly alter its value whenever needed e.g. “pagination to scroll” in vertical writing, mix-blend-mode
in sepia mode, “number of columns” user setting, etc.
This will recalc the body
’s max-width
, causing a reflow which will propagate to the column layout we set for :root
.
When the spec was published, the Financial Times immediately switched to its own JavaScript implementation for the following reasons:
- configurable column widths, gutters and margins;
- better handling of
position: absolute || fixed
; - support of
column-span: <integer>
; - better fragmentation (column breaks);
- grouping of columns into pages;
- enforce a baseline grid;
- better handling of
box-shadow
andoutline
.
As far as we can tell, this implementation might create some issues, especially when it comes to a11y because it duplicates and hides part of elements to manage fragmentation.
It is our understanding the Opera implementation of overflow: -o-paged-x
in Presto solved most of the spec’s limitations, as listed by the Financial Times:
position: fixed || absolute
;- fragmentation;
column-span: integer
;- overflow, by switching to paged media;
- implementing CSS figures as a bonus.
It is important to note the spec has been republished as a Working Draft. It is very unlikely a level 2 spec will tackle those problems in the short term.
From experience, we can also report there tends to be implementation-specific bugs with newer layout specs e.g. flexbox, grid, etc.
There are several shortcomings we must deal with:
- the
column-gap
applies to adjacent column boxes, but there is nothing to set acolumns-start-margin
andcolumns-end-margin
: this is particularly problematic when columns are set at the:root
level and overflow; - there is no JavaScript API available, we don’t even know the number of columns which have been created and their real width;
- since we can’t use
overflow: paged-x
, there is no way we can force thescrollWidth
to be a multiple of the viewport, we must force the creation of an extra column if needed. - the lack of “column queries” makes it really difficult for authors to do responsive design.