Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non map size generation [custom total size in blocks feature request] #287

Open
danivenk opened this issue Jun 1, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@danivenk
Copy link

danivenk commented Jun 1, 2024

So I've been using the amazing Mapartcraft to make maparts for a while now on my server. However, currently, we're working on a perimeter to which I would like to add a kind of mapart to such that it would show up nicely on the world map. I have however one problem, the perimeter is not the size of a map nor is it centered around one.
As such I would like to request a feature for the generation of such "mapart" with custom sizes in actual blocks instead of maps.
Yes, I have tried to look at alternatives but either the dittering algorithms were not as extensive or they wouldn't be able to export the result to a schematic.
If this would be possible to be added that would really be appreciated. If not then please say so and I'll keep looking for alternatives.

@PapaLoong
Copy link

Yes, I also need this feature, although 64x64 bit does not work well, but I wish I could implement this feature

@rebane2001
Copy link
Owner

fyi it's possible to use fractional values in the classic version

@danivenk
Copy link
Author

danivenk commented Sep 1, 2024

It would be nice to have this too in the current version of the tool too. Maybe even that it would calculate the fraction if the user fills in. Altho ideally I would like to be able to input an actual block count, but if that is too much work reimplementing the fraction inputs from the classic version is also fine by me.

Please do whatever you feel is the right way and what you have the time for to do, after all this is just a feature request and there are technically ways to circumvent it by hacking the input image file to get what you want (by padding it to the size of a multiple of 128). Just that that is however more work than if you could input the direct size yourself.

@rebane2001
Copy link
Owner

yeah it definitely should have it, but i'm not all that active with dev right now so i just wanted to mention it as an alternative for now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants