Ensure all label sequences are automated

[mpadge]

This is the more general issue behind #102 and #103. Our labels are:

And we have the following transitions in our config/settings-production.yml:

• is not automatically added (Update setting for 0/editorial-team-prep label #102)
• ➡️ in assign_editor responder
• ➡️ in seeking_reviewers responder
• ➡️ in seeking_reviewers responder
• ➡️ - in submit_reviews responder
• ➡️ - not currently automated
• ➡️ - in approve responder

So we're missing two stages in our automation:

• Initially adding
• ➡️

Comments please @maelle @noamross. In particular, it seems the following questions need answering:

1. What command or automation step could/should we use to automatically add ? Should we detect that checks are okay, and auto-add label then?
2. What command should we add to transition 4\ ➡️ 5\? Should it be able to be issued by both editor and author?

[maelle]

What command should we add to transition 4\ ➡️ 5? Should it be able to be issued by both editor and author?

Shouldn't it be

buffy/config/settings-production.yml

Line 18 in 044d630

ropensci_submit_author_response:

?

[mpadge]

Yes, i guess so ❓ Trick there would be that those are individual responses, and there is no equivalent of this:

buffy/config/settings-production.yml

Lines 16 to 17 in 044d630

	label_when_all_reviews_in: "4/review(s)-in-awaiting-changes"
	unlabel_when_all_reviews_in: "3/reviewer(s)-assigned"

that is, no way of identifying an all_responses_in event...

[maelle]

this is a responder for the author to indicate where the response is. Only one such response is expected.

[mpadge]

Okay, then that would indeed be the place. Do you want to update #103 with that change?

[maelle]

That's what #103 does?

[mpadge]

Aha - 💡 goes on in my 🧠 ❗ ... then the only remaining problem is that it is not a proper transition. The good news for me is that it means this issue was still worthwhile. And what I think i now need to ask you to do is also:

add_labels:
  - 5/awaiting-reviewer(s)-responses

Right ❓

[maelle]

Right!

[mpadge]

@maelle Just cleaning out some issues, including closing this one which I think is okay now.