Skip to content

Question about gloo_timers::callback::Timeout #492

Open
@pg-wtatum

Description

@pg-wtatum

The example shown at https://docs.rs/gloo-timers/0.3.0/gloo_timers/#timeouts-with-a-callback-function indicates it's okay to forget a timeout if you don't intend to cancel it. I see that Timeout uses Closure::once. Docs on Closure::once indicate that it enforces at runtime that it is only called on time but I didn't see anything indicating if resources associated to the closure are automatically cleaned up (as opposed to being leaked) after it has run.

Will repeatedly calling Timeout::new(...).forget() leak resources?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions