|
| 1 | +Overview |
| 2 | +################### |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +The Consortium |
| 5 | +********************** |
| 6 | +The Specify Collections Consortium (SCC) is an international, non-profit, membership |
| 7 | +organization of biological museums, universities and government agencies working |
| 8 | +together to advance computerization within biodiversity research collections. The SCC |
| 9 | +does this by providing open-source software platforms and technical services for |
| 10 | +specimen data digitization and collection management. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +As of November 2024, the Specify Collections Consortium comprises 142-member |
| 13 | +institutions from 24 countries that collectively use Specify software in 451 research |
| 14 | +collections. (The SCC member list is available on our web site, |
| 15 | +http://www.specifysoftware.org/members.) The Consortium is financially and legally |
| 16 | +administered as a U.S. 501(c)3 non-profit organization under the Office of Research of |
| 17 | +the University of Kansas, a U.S. public research university. Prior to 2018, the Specify |
| 18 | +initiative was funded by grants for 20+ years by the U.S. National Science Foundation. |
| 19 | +Reaching back to its roots in 1987, the Consortium represents 36 years of biodiversity |
| 20 | +collection community engagement with collections software and technical support. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +The Consortium’s financial health has been strong since we transformed the Specify |
| 23 | +initiative to an institution membership organization in 2018. Membership has grown an |
| 24 | +average of 14% per year; in 2024 the SCC’s membership revenue will reach $486,000 USD. |
| 25 | +The University of Kansas provides additional salary support to the Consortium in the |
| 26 | +amount of $186,000 per year. Supplemental revenue comes from grants. In 2024, with |
| 27 | +$192,000 in grant funding from the Swiss Academy of Sciences SwissCollNet Program, |
| 28 | +and in collaboration with several Swiss museums of natural history, we are extending |
| 29 | +Specify to the geosciences for managing research collections of rocks, minerals, gems, |
| 30 | +and meteorites. The extension will be available as of the first quarter of 2025. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +Expertise and Services |
| 33 | +********************** |
| 34 | +The SCC office, acting as home base for its software engineers and support staff, is |
| 35 | +located in the Biodiversity Institute at the University of Kansas in Lawrence Kansas. |
| 36 | +Staff includes the Director (Dr. J.H. Beach), three professional software engineers, |
| 37 | +two professional technical support staff, four junior undergraduate software engineers, |
| 38 | +and three undergraduate software quality testers. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +With member fulfillment and technical services, the SCC provides timely responses to |
| 41 | +help desk requests. We also operate a Specify Community Forum site that serves as a hub |
| 42 | +for Specify member feedback and discussion (http://discourse.specifysoftware.org). In |
| 43 | +addition to producing new capabilities in regular Specify software releases and fixing |
| 44 | +bugs in minor updates, we also work with SCC member collections to migrate historical |
| 45 | +data sets and to resolve technical or data issues that arise. We have a deep technical |
| 46 | +understanding of the research and curatorial goals of collections scientists and of the |
| 47 | +data management tasks that are part of museum operations. Our professional software |
| 48 | +engineering and support staff have decades of experience working with collections of |
| 49 | +all biological disciplines, sample preparation types and collection work protocols. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Why use Specify Software? |
| 52 | +------------------------- |
| 53 | +We understand biological collections and their data, A-to-Z and top-to-bottom. No team |
| 54 | +on the planet has worked with more collections’ data or converted more legacy database |
| 55 | +systems to a modern relational database design than we have. The SCC was born in the |
| 56 | +biological collections community, and we have been embedded and fully-engaged with |
| 57 | +research collections for decades. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +Since the mid-1990s our approach to the semantics, structure, and logical processing of |
| 60 | +biological collections data has met the needs of hundreds of collections curators and |
| 61 | +researchers, worldwide. One ingredient for our long-term success, and ongoing utility of |
| 62 | +Specify for biological collections, lies in the design of Specify’s layered software |
| 63 | +architecture. Specify has a highly-adaptable, collection-centric design that allows |
| 64 | +interface forms, components, languages, and even embedded help tips to be customized |
| 65 | +for each collection. By using configuration preferences and settings, Specify’s data |
| 66 | +forms can be optimized around a collection’s standard protocols without modifying |
| 67 | +Specify’s codebase or database design. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Our flagship software platform, Specify 7, combines the interface design components and |
| 70 | +data management foundation we supported for over 15 years in Specify 6, our Java |
| 71 | +thick-client platform, with the efficiency and ease-of-use of web-based data access and |
| 72 | +cloud computing. The Specify 7 web application uses the same data forms layout language |
| 73 | +as Specify 6, so user interface customizations made in one platform are mirrored in the |
| 74 | +other. Also because Specify 6 and Specify 7 use the same database schema in a MySQL or |
| 75 | +MariaDB database, they can be run simultaneously within a biological collection. By |
| 76 | +providing a clear migration path to the web, Specify 7 has helped transition Specify 6 |
| 77 | +collections to cloud computing. Specify 7 is also a great starting platform for |
| 78 | +institutions that prefer to avoid managing server hardware or workstation software |
| 79 | +installation, with the added benefit of ubiquitous web browser access. Specify 7 server |
| 80 | +software is supported on generic Linux servers, which provides an option to consider a |
| 81 | +cloud hosted deployment to handle server administration, security management, and data |
| 82 | +backup. Institutions can use their own hosting provider or the SCC’s Specify Cloud |
| 83 | +service (https://www.specifysoftware.org/products/cloud/) to host their collection |
| 84 | +databases. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Moving forward |
| 87 | +********************** |
| 88 | +The Specify team is constantly working on enhancing the user experience by revising |
| 89 | +code and adding new features. The 2025 Work Program for development and outreach can be |
| 90 | +found on our Forum (https://discourse.specifysoftware.org/t/2025-scc-work-program/2273). |
| 91 | +Development priorities are established through feedback and discussion with our Board |
| 92 | +of Members, User Advisory Committee, and Technology Advisory Committee, as well as our |
| 93 | +interactions with our members via email, meetings, and our member Forum. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +Working with New Members |
| 96 | +************************** |
| 97 | +Specify staff includes an Implementation Officer and Technical Support Officer who will |
| 98 | +take the lead in analyzing data and workflow requirements, as well as work with customer |
| 99 | +staff to discuss implementation options to decide on a path forward as well as a |
| 100 | +timeline for the decided path. The discussions may involve weekly or monthly meetings |
| 101 | +between us and the customers, site visits potentially on both sides, and training on |
| 102 | +Specify software. |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +We have a long history of working with organizations to onboard them into Specify |
| 105 | +software. We have worked with collections of all sizes from a few hundred specimens |
| 106 | +to around a billion (Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans), just about every |
| 107 | +natural history discipline, different collection types (preserved specimen, lots, |
| 108 | +DNA/tissue, etc.), different complexities from a single collection to consortia with |
| 109 | +dozens of institutions each with multiple disciplines. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +We have also worked with several consortia of institutions with natural history and |
| 112 | +geology collections to bring their data into Specify, including the Denmark Consortia |
| 113 | +of Natural History Collections, the South African National Biodiversity Institute |
| 114 | +(SANBI), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), and the |
| 115 | +Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). We are also currently working with a |
| 116 | +Greek Consortia of Natural History Collections to obtain a grant to bring their |
| 117 | +institutions’ data into Specify. We can not only leverage that experience in our |
| 118 | +discussions and plans, we have a close relationship with representatives from those |
| 119 | +consortia who we can reference or meet with to come to the most effective plan for |
| 120 | +Norway’s data migration. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +We have completed or are currently working with the above Consortia to plan how they |
| 123 | +structured their data, each defining optimal work protocols and methods according to |
| 124 | +their workflow, institutional independence, and support level. Decisions on how they |
| 125 | +structured collection data in their institutional network had downstream effects on |
| 126 | +how their information was imported and standardized, all of which we mapped out for |
| 127 | +them and assisted, including followup visits and constant interactions. All of the |
| 128 | +consortia we’ve worked with are also on our Board of Members, so they are active |
| 129 | +participants in deciding the future of our development and of the SCC as a whole. |
0 commit comments