-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Index out of bounds #68
Comments
Hi! Sorry for the delay in reply, I'm not sure how I missed the notifications. You are correct that -F 260 will exclude any unmapped or reads that are not primary alignment. It's using the htslib engine under the hood the same as samtools, those flags act the same way. If that works for you I'm probably not going to have time to dig into this a lot further in the near future. It's been a while since I've been in the code here! |
No problem.
"as is" this analysis is giving me good results.
I do not find any "instructions" for citing your work.
I appreciate that you are not actively developing this code, but if there is specific language you would prefer for acknowledgement, please let me know.
Thanks!
From: Seth ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 3:43 PM
To: sstadick/perbase ***@***.***>
Cc: Richie, Christopher (NIH/NIDA) [E] ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [sstadick/perbase] Index out of bounds (Issue #68)
Hi! Sorry for the delay in reply, I'm not sure how I missed the notifications. You are correct that -F 260 will exclude any unmapped or reads that are not primary alignment. It's using the htslib engine under the hood the same as samtools, those flags act the same way.
If that works for you I'm probably not going to have time to dig into this a lot further in the near future. It's been a while since I've been in the code here!
-
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#68 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AR4COQZL33RIJD5CFZDTAWDX6RHSRAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5RTW2HGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONJTGYYTKNRSG4>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are confident the content is safe.
|
Hi! I appreciate the ask about citations! Nobody has asked about that before. I've added a Citation file and there should now be a
|
I very much appreciate the code you've shared.
Thanks!
From: Seth ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 11:15 AM
To: sstadick/perbase ***@***.***>
Cc: Richie, Christopher (NIH/NIDA) [E] ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [sstadick/perbase] Index out of bounds (Issue #68)
Hi! I appreciate the ask about citations! Nobody has asked about that before. I've added a Citation file and there should now be a Cite the repository button on the sidebar of the main page. I have no specific language to add to what it auto generates.
Stadick, S. (2023). Perbase (Version 0.9.0) [Computer software]
-
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#68 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AR4COQ724ODK2IBCENRJ7ZLX62ZXVANCNFSM6AAAAAA5RTW2HE>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are confident the content is safe.
|
Hi Sstadick,
FIRST, thanks for sharing this program, I have been looking for this since I got my ONT Minion... I do not know how I have missed it over the past several years, but today my Google search unlocked something.
I have a question about the "index out of bounds" that I think is similar to issue #53.
I had four CRAM files (and matching sorted BAMs) and a reference... some of them failed on the basic command:
perbase base-depth [cram]
or
perbase base-depth [bam]
These same files did work, and produced results, when I included the -F 260 flag.
Can you clarify what is excluded when I use the -F 260 parameter?
as in:
perbase base-depth BC06_SAMPLE.pass.cram -r CR2839_ref.fa --output BC06.tsv -F 260
I think that it would exclude any unmapped reads and/or any reads that are not in the primary alignment. (This situation would be ok for my intended use case.)
Thanks again.
this code lets me avoid showing BAM alignments through IGV at lab meeting, and lets me boil them down into line graphs... THANKS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: