Fido2 vs u2f #468
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ | ||||||
| --- | ||||||
| title: FIDO2 vs U2F 5 Key Differences Explained | ||||||
| description: "Understand the differences between FIDO2 and U2F. Learn how each works, where they apply, and which authentication standard to choose." | ||||||
| date: "2025-11-16" | ||||||
| cover: "TODO" | ||||||
| category: "passwordless, u2f, best practices" | ||||||
| author: "Maurice Saldivar" | ||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## FIDO2 vs U2F: 5 Key Differences Explained | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F laid the groundwork for strong, phishing-resistant authentication. FIDO2 builds on it with broader use cases and modern support. Here's how they differ. | ||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. this being the first paragraph is confusing, We need to assume that most people reading this article don't know what either of these two standards are |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Authentication standards evolve to address real security gaps. U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) emerged in 2014 to combat phishing attacks that traditional multi-factor authentication couldn't prevent. FIDO2 arrived in 2018 as the next generation, expanding beyond second-factor authentication to support passwordless login. Both standards use public-key cryptography and bind credentials to specific domains, making them resistant to phishing, credential stuffing, and man-in-the-middle attacks. | ||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. this section needs to be reworked, to flow better, for example also mention that this blog goes over 5 key differences to help devs choose between the two |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## 1. Scope of Use | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F operates exclusively as a second factor. Users must first authenticate with a password before U2F verification occurs. The security key proves possession of a registered device but cannot replace the initial authentication step. | ||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Make similar changes to the rest of the points so it feels better organized |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 supports both multi-factor and passwordless authentication. In multi-factor mode, it functions similarly to U2F. In passwordless mode, the security key becomes the sole authentication method. Users verify their identity through biometrics or a PIN on the authenticator itself, eliminating passwords entirely. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Add a "Why this matters" subheading here |
||||||
| This architectural difference affects deployment strategy. Organizations using U2F must maintain password infrastructure: reset flows, complexity requirements, and rotation policies. With FIDO2 passwordless authentication, these concerns disappear. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## 2. Underlying Standards | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F operates as a single specification published by the FIDO Alliance. The standard defines the complete authentication flow: browser communication, cryptographic operations, and data formats. This unified approach simplified initial adoption but limited flexibility. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 splits functionality across two complementary standards. WebAuthn provides the browser API that web applications use to request authentication. CTAP2 (Client to Authenticator Protocol 2) defines how clients communicate with authenticators, whether external security keys or platform authenticators like Windows Hello or Touch ID. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| This separation creates clear responsibility boundaries. WebAuthn standardizes what developers implement, regardless of which authenticator users choose. CTAP2 handles device communication, allowing authenticator manufacturers to innovate without breaking web applications. CTAP2 includes CTAP1, which provides U2F functionality, enabling backward compatibility during migration. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## 3. Device Compatibility | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F authenticates exclusively through external hardware tokens. Users must purchase and carry physical security keys like YubiKey or Titan Security Key. The protocol has no mechanism for using biometrics or built-in device capabilities. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 authenticates through both external keys and platform authenticators. Platform authenticators leverage hardware already present in devices: fingerprint sensors on laptops, facial recognition on smartphones, or TPM chips in computers. Windows Hello, Touch ID, Face ID, and Android biometric authentication all function as FIDO2 authenticators. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| This flexibility changes deployment economics. Organizations can implement FIDO2 without purchasing additional hardware for users with compatible devices. A laptop with a fingerprint reader or a phone with Face ID becomes the authenticator. Platform authenticators improve user experience for single-device scenarios, but external keys provide portability across devices. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## 4. Browser & Platform Support | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F reached peak browser support around 2017 before browsers began deprecating it. Chrome deprecated the U2F API in Chrome 98 (2022) and removed it entirely in Chrome 115 (2023). Firefox deprecated U2F in favor of WebAuthn starting in version 60. Safari never implemented U2F natively. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 through WebAuthn has universal modern browser support. Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge all implement the WebAuthn standard with full functionality. Mobile browsers on iOS and Android support FIDO2, enabling authentication on smartphones and tablets. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Platform support extends to operating systems. Windows 10 and later include Windows Hello. macOS and iOS support Touch ID and Face ID through WebAuthn. Android devices use fingerprint sensors and facial recognition as platform authenticators. For new implementations, FIDO2 is the only viable choice. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## 5. Passwordless Capability | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F cannot enable passwordless authentication. The protocol requires an initial password authentication before the second factor verification. This design limitation means U2F deployments must maintain complete password infrastructure, including reset mechanisms and complexity policies. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 enables passwordless authentication through resident credentials (also called discoverable credentials or passkeys). The authenticator stores credential information locally, allowing users to authenticate without entering a username. The authentication flow becomes: connect authenticator, verify identity through biometrics or PIN, gain access. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Resident credentials work across devices when using external security keys. A YubiKey registered for passwordless authentication functions on any computer or mobile device that supports FIDO2. Platform authenticators create device-specific credentials: Touch ID credentials on a MacBook work only on that MacBook. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The passwordless capability eliminates entire categories of password-related attacks: phishing, credential stuffing, password spraying, and database breaches. Organizations deploying FIDO2 passwordless authentication remove passwords from the attack surface for those users. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Comparison Table | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Feature | U2F | FIDO2 | | ||||||
| |---------|-----|-------| | ||||||
| | Use Case | 2FA only | 2FA + Passwordless | | ||||||
| | Standards | U2F API | WebAuthn + CTAP | | ||||||
| | Devices | Hardware keys | Hardware + platform authenticators | | ||||||
| | Browser Support | Deprecated (removed from modern browsers) | Universal (Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge) | | ||||||
| | Passwordless Support | ❌ | ✅ | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Which Should You Use Today? | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F is a legacy standard. Chrome removed U2F API support in 2023, and other browsers either deprecated or never implemented it. Applications still using U2F APIs will break as browsers complete the removal process. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 is the modern replacement, already powering passkeys and supported by tech giants (Apple, Google, Microsoft). New implementations should go directly to FIDO2 for future-proof authentication. Most security keys supporting U2F also support FIDO2, making hardware migration straightforward. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Organizations with existing U2F deployments should plan migration before browser support ends completely. The migration requires rewriting authentication code to use WebAuthn APIs, but this work becomes necessary regardless as browsers remove U2F support. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## How SuperTokens Fits Into FIDO2 Adoption | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Passwordless Support | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| SuperTokens implements FIDO2 through the WebAuthn recipe, handling protocol complexity while exposing clean APIs for developers: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ```javascript | ||||||
| import SuperTokens from "supertokens-node"; | ||||||
| import WebAuthn from "supertokens-node/recipe/webauthn"; | ||||||
| import Session from "supertokens-node/recipe/session"; | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| SuperTokens.init({ | ||||||
| appInfo: { | ||||||
| appName: "Your App", | ||||||
| apiDomain: "https://api.example.com", | ||||||
| websiteDomain: "https://example.com" | ||||||
| }, | ||||||
| recipeList: [ | ||||||
| WebAuthn.init(), | ||||||
| Session.init() | ||||||
| ] | ||||||
| }); | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The implementation supports both platform authenticators and external security keys. Users can register multiple authenticators per account, providing backup options and cross-device flexibility. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Session Security Beyond FIDO2 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| FIDO2 authenticates users, but session management requires additional security measures. SuperTokens provides automatic token refresh, CSRF protection, and token theft detection. These session security features work regardless of authentication method, whether users authenticate via FIDO2, passwords, or social login. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Hybrid Auth Flows | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Organizations rarely deploy a single authentication method. SuperTokens supports mixing methods: employees use FIDO2 with enterprise SSO, customers prefer social login or email OTP. The recipe system allows adding authentication methods without rewriting existing code: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ```javascript | ||||||
| SuperTokens.init({ | ||||||
| recipeList: [ | ||||||
| EmailPassword.init(), | ||||||
| ThirdParty.init({ | ||||||
| signInAndUpFeature: { | ||||||
| providers: [ThirdParty.Google.init()] | ||||||
| } | ||||||
| }), | ||||||
| WebAuthn.init(), | ||||||
| Session.init() | ||||||
| ] | ||||||
| }); | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### Future-Proof | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Starting with basic authentication and expanding capabilities as requirements evolve avoids over-engineering. Add email authentication initially, then introduce FIDO2 when users request stronger security. As passkey adoption increases, enable the feature by activating the WebAuthn recipe without modifying existing accounts or session management. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Conclusion | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| U2F established phishing-resistant authentication as a viable security control. FIDO2 extends these security properties while addressing U2F's limitations: passwordless support, platform authenticators, and universal browser compatibility. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The five key differences affect implementation decisions: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| * **Scope**: FIDO2's dual support for multi-factor and passwordless authentication provides deployment flexibility | ||||||
| * **Standards**: WebAuthn and CTAP2 separation creates clear boundaries between web APIs and device communication | ||||||
| * **Devices**: Platform authenticator support eliminates hardware procurement for many users | ||||||
| * **Browser Support**: Universal implementation versus deprecated status | ||||||
| * **Passwordless**: Resident credentials enable password elimination | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| For new implementations, use FIDO2. The standard has industry backing through the passkeys initiative, comprehensive browser support, and active ecosystem development. Existing U2F deployments should plan migration before browser support ends completely. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| SuperTokens simplifies FIDO2 adoption by handling protocol complexity and providing session security beyond authentication. The recipe system supports gradual capability expansion, allowing organizations to start with basic authentication and add FIDO2 when requirements justify it. | ||||||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove this, title is already mentioned as the h1 tag