You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I was looking at your paper, Mismatched: Evaluating the Limits of Image
Matching Approaches and Benchmarks link. In Figure 1, you put RoMa at 0% on the Niantic benchmark, but looking at Table 1 it looks like RoMa should be around 20% wrt GIM (0.104/0.560=0.18). Am I reading that right?
Also, do you have any thoughts on why RoMa did so poorly in that benchmark considering it did so well in the OoD benchmark? Is the thought that RoMa may do better if something like colmap instead of mickey were use to estimate the camera?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but I was looking at your paper, Mismatched: Evaluating the Limits of Image
Matching Approaches and Benchmarks link. In Figure 1, you put RoMa at 0% on the Niantic benchmark, but looking at Table 1 it looks like RoMa should be around 20% wrt GIM (0.104/0.560=0.18). Am I reading that right?
Also, do you have any thoughts on why RoMa did so poorly in that benchmark considering it did so well in the OoD benchmark? Is the thought that RoMa may do better if something like colmap instead of mickey were use to estimate the camera?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: